Page 4 of 7 FirstFirst ... 23456 ... LastLast
Results 31 to 40 of 62

Thread: Advertising

  1. #31
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    5,798
    Blog Entries
    109

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ber View Post
    I have no problem with u getting extra exposure if u pay extra, that is a basic law of economics, what i have a problem with
    is the girls who pay extra being advertised as NEW or BACK which they are not. Most other sites have an Elite section so if
    u pay extra u will be put in that section. Everybody then knows where they stand so i cant see why this cant be done here
    The way its operating at the moment other girls are discriminated against as they are bumped off the page faster and
    CLIENTS ARE BEING LIED TO BY BEING TOLD GIRLS ARE NEW OR BACK WHEN THEY ARE NOT. Why is there a new or back
    section when it does not advertise exclusively new or back girls?
    The answer is easy change the "New or Back" to "Updated"

    Tiff

    " Tiffany Tees "
    Strangers are friends I have yet to meet.





  2. #32

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by TiffanyT View Post
    The answer is easy change the "New or Back" to "Updated"

    Tiff
    But us clients want to see who is New or Back!! Updated could mean anything, but at least it would not be a lie like it now is
    Last edited by lcilis26; 16-02-11 at 18:36.

  3. #33
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    5,608
    Blog Entries
    1
    Reviews
    95

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by TiffanyT View Post
    The answer is easy change the "New or Back" to "Updated"

    Tiff
    I think that is a cop out, it is very apparent that the concensous here is that those that want to pay extra for advertising
    should have a seperate section. It will also make it clear to the client that these ladies are using extra promotion which
    is only fair i think. It also dosent deal with the ordinary advertisers getting very little time on the main page.
    I think the seperate elite/premium section is a fair compromise to all
    Blatant promotion should be outlawed
    but
    Vincent Browne is a Hero

  4. #34
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    5,798
    Blog Entries
    109

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ber View Post
    I think that is a cop out, it is very apparent that the concensous here is that those that want to pay extra for advertising
    should have a seperate section. It will also make it clear to the client that these ladies are using extra promotion which
    is only fair i think. It also dosent deal with the ordinary advertisers getting very little time on the main page.
    I think the seperate elite/premium section is a fair compromise to all
    I think your missing the point Ber as we all know the more you pay for advertising the more exposure you get thats why we have all heard of the big companies but not many of the little one. The more you pay the more exposure you get!

    Wasnt it Lord Sugar that said "I have written books on advertising, cheque books"

    All that I am saying is at the minute ALL the Ladies have the option to pay for more exposure, they also have the choice not to. The system was changed not by my request but I will continue to play it untill it changes again.


    Tiff

    " Tiffany Tees "
    Strangers are friends I have yet to meet.





  5. #35

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by TiffanyT View Post
    I think your missing the point Ber as we all know the more you pay for advertising the more exposure you get thats why we have all heard of the big companies but not many of the little one. The more you pay the more exposure you get!

    Wasnt it Lord Sugar that said "I have written books on advertising, cheque books"

    All that I am saying is at the minute ALL the Ladies have the option to pay for more exposure, they also have the choice not to. The system was changed not by my request but I will continue to play it untill it changes again.


    Tiff
    But your also missing the point a little. I (as a client) want to know who is "New" in town or who is "Back" in town not who is paying the most for advertising. If the contents of the "New or Back" section is to contain those who just pay more to advertise then it should be labeled something accordingly like "Premium Rate Advertisers"
    Last edited by lcilis26; 16-02-11 at 19:05.

  6. #36
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Posts
    916
    Reviews
    4

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by lcilis26 View Post
    But your also missing the point a little. I (as a client) want to know who is "New" in town or who is "Back" in town not who is paying the most for advertising. If the contents of the "New or Back" section is to contain those who just pay more to advertise then it should be labeled something accordingly like "Premium Rate Advertisers"
    Nah Tiffany isn't missing the point at all. Obviously the clients want to know who is New or Just Back, but with the way the system is now, that section is open to those paying more. I don't blame her for taking full advantage of it, any shrewd business person would.
    So although we would like to know who Really is new or just back, any blame has to be laid at the door of a currently flawed system.

  7. The Following User Says Thank You to ChiefHandker For This Useful Post:

    TiffanyTees (16-02-11)

  8. #37
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Posts
    2,392

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by lcilis26 View Post
    But your also missing the point a little. I (as a client) want to know who is "New" in town or who is "Back" in town not who is paying the most for advertising. If the contents of the "New or Back" section is to contain those who just pay more to advertise then it should be labeled something accordingly like "Premium Rate Advertisers"

    Yes Tiff is fully within her right to use the system to her advantage.

    CG
    Last edited by City Gent; 16-02-11 at 19:14.
    I intend to live forever. So far, so good.

    Wise men talk because they have something to say;
    fools talk because they have to say something:
    Plato

  9. The Following User Says Thank You to City Gent For This Useful Post:

    TiffanyTees (16-02-11)

  10. #38
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    5,608
    Blog Entries
    1
    Reviews
    95

    Default A Go

    Quote Originally Posted by ChiefHandker View Post
    Nah Tiffany isn't missing the point at all. Obviously the clients want to know who is New or Just Back, but with the way the system is now, that section is open to those paying more. I don't blame her for taking full advantage of it, any shrewd business person would.
    So although we would like to know who Really is new or just back, any blame has to be laid at the door of a currently flawed system.
    Im not having a go at Tiff here im just pointing out the unfairness of the system
    and that it needs to be amended. Im just looking for fairness for all and transparency
    It should also be pointed out that more and more girls are at it now seeing as the
    flaw has gotten out and the real benefactors are E-I with extra revenue
    Blatant promotion should be outlawed
    but
    Vincent Browne is a Hero

  11. #39

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ChiefHandker View Post
    Nah Tiffany isn't missing the point at all. Obviously the clients want to know who is New or Just Back, but with the way the system is now, that section is open to those paying more. I don't blame her for taking full advantage of it, any shrewd business person would.
    So although we would like to know who Really is new or just back, any blame has to be laid at the door of a currently flawed system.
    I'm not blaming Tiffany in the slightest. I know it is the site is flawed.

  12. #40
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Posts
    31,568

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ber View Post
    Im not having a go at Tiff here im just pointing out the unfairness of the system
    and that it needs to be amended. Im just looking for fairness for all and transparency
    It should also be pointed out that more and more girls are at it now seeing as the
    flaw has gotten out and the real benefactors are E-I with extra revenue
    We do our best to be fair to everyone. When escorts put up touting threads in the general chat forums, they come down and we are accused of being ridiculous. When phone numbers and email address are posted in blogs and visitor messages, they come down. When adverts are posted in the non-advertising forum with contact details in them, they are amended. This situation seems to be a matter of perspective really. Some escorts build relationships with clients via the medium of conversing on the boards, and that's a form of exposure in itself. There is only so much control we can have on escort exposure.

Page 4 of 7 FirstFirst ... 23456 ... LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •