Page 6 of 6 FirstFirst ... 456
Results 51 to 54 of 54

Thread: question about reporting fakes

  1. #51
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Posts
    31,568

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by googleplex View Post
    wow! honest they were there 10 minutes ago. I hit cache refresh to make sure I was not seeing past version stored in memory.
    I did see them fella, but didn't press 'print screen' fast enough! LOL! Perhaps this is proving to be a useful deterrent?

  2. #52
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Posts
    31,568

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by googleplex View Post
    I'm with you now, thanx for explaining. 2 proven fakes with links gets a ban, 3 reports of rotation but no proof causes the same.
    Yes, exactly. I'm trying to keep it really simple and that's a fair overview of what I'm saying.

  3. #53
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    276

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by samlad View Post
    I did see them fella, but didn't press 'print screen' fast enough! LOL! Perhaps this is proving to be a useful deterrent?
    no record of activity on the update page, taking them down must not cause a log to be made on that page, only if they are changed or added.

  4. #54
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Posts
    31,568

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by googleplex View Post
    no record of activity on the update page, taking them down must not cause a log to be made on that page, only if they are changed or added.
    Yes, you're right. However in the back office system, it logs as 'profile update' on the escort's audit trail, but that's too ambiguous to do anything with.
    Last edited by samlad; 19-02-11 at 12:11.

  5. The Following User Says Thank You to samlad For This Useful Post:

    googleplex (19-02-11)

Page 6 of 6 FirstFirst ... 456

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •