question about reporting fakes

[samlad]

Thanks Sam, this is another step in the right direction, I know in the past long before your time, even before mods there has been various brainstorms to try counteract this problem, some were never implemented others just didn't work but it seems we have the right staff and hopefully manpower to pull it off this time once and for good

Thanks fella. Hopefully we can resolve these issues.

[googleplex]

Yes, it does

Thats great Samlad, big improvement, just as a test case would this cause new pics top be removed on this profile,

Vanessa, Meath Female Independent Escort, profile on Escort Ireland

The new ones are nothing like the person reported and the report is from yesterday so you can see snap from yesterday and compare with now.

Unverified so is being able to see the profile as it was yesterday and as it is now and the fake report and being unverified today enough to ban for 30 days on a second offense ?

[samlad]

Pictures have been taken down, as I have the screen shots of completely different pictures from this morning. Strike 2.

[googleplex]

Pictures have been taken down, as I have the screen shots of completely different pictures from this morning. Strike 2.

Now we'r suckin diesel

[googleplex]

Pictures have been taken down, as I have the screen shots of completely different pictures from this morning. Strike 2.

she has new pics up, I thought strike 2 caused a 30 day ban

Vanessa, Meath Female Independent Escort, profile on Escort Ireland

if ei has time can they post a sticky as to what the rules or guidelines are in relation to reporting pics now that ei can see previous pics and this 2 strike thing. Its a waste of everyones time and ei's time reporting things when we dont know exactly what will have action taken and not.

For example the other day I reported to say that a profile had replacement pics unverified for just a day of two and they were taken down just on that but then I reported over half a dozen and one was exactly like my example but unverified for 19 days and it was rejected along with other of over eight days.

Whats caused one to be activated and all the other older ones not ?

Just would like to not waste my time or ei's please.

[googleplex]

heres another example

Sorraya, Dublin Female Independent Escort, profile on Escort Ireland

the second report is just to say that the new replacments are not like the previous. I include no proof but ei has seen the snap and agrees so its activated but the pics are still up.

Is it the case when we report without proof and you see snapshot you may activate but not slap a 30 day ban or remove pics ?

I dont mind if thats your policy I just would like to know what the policy is or is this just an error in not removing or giving a 30 stint in the county lock up ?

[samlad]

she has new pics up, I thought strike 2 caused a 30 day ban

Vanessa, Meath Female Independent Escort, profile on Escort Ireland

if ei has time can they post a sticky as to what the rules or guidelines are in relation to reporting pics now that ei can see previous pics and this 2 strike thing. Its a waste of everyones time and ei's time reporting things when we dont know exactly what will have action taken and not.

For example the other day I reported to say that a profile had replacement pics unverified for just a day of two and they were taken down just on that but then I reported over half a dozen and one was exactly like my example but unverified for 19 days and it was rejected along with other of over eight days.

Whats caused one to be activated and all the other older ones not ?

Just would like to not waste my time or ei's please.

We only inmplemented this idea yesterday, so please bear with us. We'll have to start dealing with them from now on as they are reported.

With regards to the strike system, this is for the rotation of different unverifed pictures without links and reports from people who meet the escort and claim it's not the escort in the picture, so it's a three strike system (with TR reports worth two strikes given their status).

Now that you've brought to my attention Vanessa's new lot of pictures, it's a third strike and a 30 day ban.

[samlad]

We only inmplemented this idea yesterday, so please bear with us. We'll have to start dealing with them from now on as they are reported.

With regards to the strike system, this is for the rotation of different unverifed pictures without links and reports from people who meet the escort and claim it's not the escort in the picture, so it's a three strike system (with TR reports worth two strikes given their status).

Now that you've brought to my attention Vanessa's new lot of pictures, it's a third strike and a 30 day ban.

And suddenly, they're gone before I did anything! LOL!

[googleplex]

We only inmplemented this idea yesterday, so please bear with us. We'll have to start dealing with them from now on as they are reported.

With regards to the strike system, this is for the rotation of different unverifed pictures without links and reports from people who meet the escort and claim it's not the escort in the picture, so it's a three strike system (with TR reports worth two strikes given their status).

Now that you've brought to my attention Vanessa's new lot of pictures, it's a third strike and a 30 day ban.

I'm with you now, thanx for explaining. 2 proven fakes with links gets a ban, 3 reports of rotation but no proof causes the same.

[googleplex]

And suddenly, they're gone before I did anything! LOL!

wow! honest they were there 10 minutes ago. I hit cache refresh to make sure I was not seeing past version stored in memory.