Strange review pattern

[El Gordo]

I can't help but feel that there is something odd about this thread. It's unusual to make accusations without saying who is being accused. Also, the average, as I mentioned above, is 12.3%. So 24% is above average, but hardly top of the league table. There is an escort with an impressive 67.7% of her reviews from first time reviewers. Which leads me to believe that simplesimon didn't go through the reviews looking for dodgy escorts, but rather went through the reviews of one particular escort trying to find something he could accuse her of. Now I don't know which escort that is. There isn't enough information in the posts above to determine that. And maybe it would be best left that way.

[simplesimon]

If you read the first post , you would have seen that it was someone i was going to see , that is why i had a look at her posts . If i wanted to name her , I would have but i did not on purpose . BTW you were the one who said in one of your threads to name her . Make up your mind .

I did not accuse anybody of anything , it is just a strange pattern

[El Gordo]

If you read the first post , you would have seen that it was someone i was going to see , that is why i had a look at her posts . If i wanted to name her , I would have but i did not on purpose . BTW you were the one who said in one of your threads to name her . Make up your mind .

I did not accuse anybody of anything , it is just a strange pattern

Can you please tell me what the point of this thread is? Okay, there is an escort with a fair number of reviews and at least 24% from first time reviewers. Fine. Actually there are at least a dozen such escorts. Some have many more than 24%. What are we meant to do with this information?