Cum on, now!

[jayf1]

You didn't answer my question about Gemma; and bitter I seem, bitter I'll be-whatever gets you thru the nite

i was around when gemma was here. i never met her so couldnt leave a review. the reason i never met her was because i am not into bbw escorts but i'm sure some are which is why she must have gotten so many good reviews.
i also never met you when you were here as i never found you or your profile did anything for me.
i also doubt if i will ever meet the escort you started this thread about as i too googled her and found her pics are out of date and she has lied on her profile about her age.

[Lincoln]

If this woman Monique Covet, Dublin Female Independent Escort, profile on Escort Ireland
has only one review, and she's been in Ireland at least two weeks then there's something WRONG about the review system and 'Reviewers' in general

I'm sorry Anita but that is the biggest load of nonsense I've ever heard. So now there is a moral responsibility to review???

Anita I have 8 or 9 reviews posted about escorts who specifically asked me to review and I was happy to do so, but I general terms I just couldnt be arsed, its no reflection on the the girl and certainly in part of some ruin her earnings strategy.....

[anitasizzle]

i was around when gemma was here. i never met her so couldnt leave a review. the reason i never met her was because i am not into bbw escorts but i'm sure some are which is why she must have gotten so many good reviews.
i also never met you when you were here as i never found you or your profile did anything for me.
i also doubt if i will ever meet the escort you started this thread about as i too googled her and found her pics are out of date and she has lied on her profile about her age.

Like I said there are many other escorts who lie about their age, and many more with out of date pics Gemma? A clear case of 'Mercy review's gone wrong, and if age and out of date pics were a problem for the escort who this thread is about then why have no reviewers mentioned it? Obviously pics and age aren't the problem, the problem is she is TO COOL FOR SCHOOL

[anitasizzle]

I'm sorry Anita but that is the biggest load of nonsense I've ever heard. So now there is a moral responsibility to review???

Anita I have 8 or 9 reviews posted about escorts who specifically asked me to raieview and I was happy to do so, but I general terms I just couldnt be arsed, its no reflection on the the girl and certainly in part of some ruin her earnings strategy.....

i
Who said anything about morals? This is an Irish escort site-fulled with Christ-spitters-people who go about their everyday lives spitting on Christ!

[monster_monster]

And there are escorts currently on this site who have photos that are at least 7 years, but they are still 'well-reviewed

that is true but as I said you can't just do a google search for any escort on this site. The most reviewed escort here is JessicaJessy, now if you search for her the only reference you will get is from this site. If Jessica decided to keep her photos up for 7 years going a simple google search would not tell you that, hence you rely on reviews.

IMO Monique is not as busy as she maybe lets on, as it is easy to see what you see on the site is not what you get (according to Google). Two pornstars that spring to mind are Jessica Loveit and Marsha, both of these girls are very well reviewed so it must be something apart from being a pornstar that is stopping punters from reviewing Monique

[dark-knight]

Most clients won't review. Some clients will review, some won't. Some escorts get em, some don't. I should be a rapper with lyrics like that.

[anitasizzle]

that is true but as I said you can't just do a google search for any escort on this site. The most reviewed escort here is JessicaJessy, now if you search for her the only reference you will get is from this site. If Jessica decided to keep her photos up for 7 years going a simple google search would not tell you that, hence you rely on reviews.

IMO Monique is not as busy as she maybe lets on, as it is easy to see what you see on the site is not what you get (according to Google). Two pornstars that spring to mind are Jessica Loveit and Marsha, both of these girls are very well reviewed so it must be something apart from being a pornstar that is stopping punters from reviewing Monique

If for any reason clients weren't happy with Monique, once they visited her, they would have written reviews saying so but that wasn't the case, and so they didn't want to write her reviews out of mean spiritness, simple as that

[anitasizzle]

Most clients won't review. Some clients will review, some won't. Some escorts get em, some don't. I should be a rapper with lyrics like that.

If that's the case then the review sysrtem should be scraped

[Mature Busty Siobhan]

If that's the case then the review sysrtem should be scraped

so where are you these days anyway?

[monster_monster]

If for any reason clients weren't happy with Monique, once they visited her, they would have written reviews saying so but that wasn't the case, and so they didn't want to write her reviews out of mean spiritness, simple as that

please STOP CHANGING THE SUBJECT, what I have said in all my threads is that Moniques current (real life) photos do not match either her age or photos on E-I, it's easy to see this (Google), so that is why punters aren't visiting her and hence the lack of reviews, simples.