Page 12 of 15 FirstFirst ... 21011121314 ... LastLast
Results 111 to 120 of 143

Thread: Why has Shirley been banned??

  1. #111
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Posts
    5,866
    Reviews
    38

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by prettywoman View Post
    I'm sure we all agree, that he does have a lot of good qualities. And in the short time of me being here, I have always thought, that he is very dedicated, spends a lot of time on here and tries his best.
    It is not easy to please everybody, in fact it is impossible. The reason the team is here and we can have an imput, that there can be different opinions considered and we can all be brought down to earth at times....
    Doozer is a good guy alright. Or maybe was up until a few month ago when all this infraction for provoking bullshit came about. I can only assume that he is following orders.

  2. #112
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    6,952

    Default

    It's not just PM access the escort is deprived of..The issue here for me is a moderator handing out infractions without much sensible consideration, resulting in a ban, and to do that is depriving an escort of access to safety information.
    No escort in her right mind is going to knowingly risk that, however the problem is this word, provocation.. and the moderators perception of what is provocation. It seems to cover a multitude of situations when the mod gets in too deep a muddle or can't think of any other valid reason to hand out a slap.
    It seems that speaking your mind, how you speak it, or the mods mind reading skills as to what you really mean can be interpreted as provocation as and when it suits.

  3. The Following User Says Thank You to UKHeather For This Useful Post:

    Irish Fiona (31-01-11)

  4. #113

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by JAMESCORK View Post
    How she said it?.. how she feckin said it?… are you guys for real?. How you say something is now infractionable?… This has to be a joke… I am dreaming… this is not real….

    I am sorry but the nighttime staff here are bordering on the ridiculous. There is no consistency, reason or intelligent structure to their moderation. I have never in my years on these boards seen so many infractions or bannings. The atmosphere is one of being in a camp run by the SS. It is getting worse by the day. This negativity cannot be good for EI forum business. Then again, forum business is just a little portion of the big business picture, so do they give a fuck…. Pffff… doubtful…

    But this particular issue is not about us, this is about an Escort that is paying €100 per week to advertise here. This customer rather than thanked for her custom is told she cannot use or access the areas or facilities that were promised to her when she decided to pay said fee to advertise. This escort who may well conduct all her appointments using PM to carry out her business, is now denied this facility because somebody has deemed how she has said something, or have predicted what she may have said, not in accordance with their interpretation of the rules. Have these members of Moderation staff considered that this escort may lose out on income due to this decision, but still are happy to keep her €100 for the weeks advertising. Would these members of staff be happy to see their wages halved for the week based on a whimsical decision…

    This place is becoming a joke… how many times recently do we have members fighting management over decisions. I have never seen it before. A bit of drama you may say Pru… pffff... too often honey, too often. Its only a matter of time I think that this will blow up in your faces… I have said it before, and I say it again, you guys need to sit down and discuss and re-evaluate. This place is going to the dogs...

    Shirleyys' ban should be reversed..... now!
    What he said. And an apology. I would invite members who object to this to address their PM to Sam VJ OR Nicole, because we are getting no where fast here.
    If life gives you lemons ask for Tequila

    Only sad bastards seek gratification from signatures

  5. #114
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    6,952

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by prettywoman View Post
    I'm sure we all agree, that he does have a lot of good qualities. And in the short time of me being here, I have always thought, that he is very dedicated, spends a lot of time on here and tries his best.
    It is not easy to please everybody, in fact it is impossible. The reason the team is here and we can have an imput, that there can be different opinions considered and we can all be brought down to earth at times....
    Tries his best? This sounds like a teacher making an excuse for an incapable schoolchild.
    This is business, peoples livelihoods. Whilst he is handing out unreasonable infractions resulting in bans, peoples working lives and safety are being affected,
    Making excuses for someone elses inadequacies is just pathetic.
    He is a man and needs to step up not hide behind apron strings.

  6. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to UKHeather For This Useful Post:

    Irish Fiona (31-01-11), Shirley Joy (31-01-11)

  7. #115

    Default

    That is a very valid point made regarding safety and I'll raise that issue, whether in case of banning an escort should be still allowed access to pm, the escort forum and the advert section of the forum.
    You guys need to wait till tomorrow, as my hands are tied regarding this unbanning issue, it will need to be a decision made by management.

  8. #116
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    2,552
    Reviews
    6

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Rayden View Post
    . Or maybe was up until a few month ago when all this infraction for provoking
    This my friend is a cop out rule , its used to ban people or posts not liked by management as they dont need to prove it as it is an opinionated infraction.
    Last edited by An don; 31-01-11 at 00:26.

  9. The Following User Says Thank You to An don For This Useful Post:

    UKHeather (31-01-11)

  10. #117
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    36,558
    Blog Entries
    15
    Reviews
    53

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by lucy chambers View Post
    What he said. And an apology. I would invite members who object to this to address their PM to Sam VJ OR Nicole, because we are getting no where fast here.
    Consider it done Luce .: doc
    Never mistake kindness for weakness .: doc

  11. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to dr love For This Useful Post:

    Lucy Chambers (31-01-11), Shirley Joy (31-01-11)

  12. #118
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    276

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by prettywoman View Post
    That is a very valid point made regarding safety and I'll raise that issue, whether in case of banning an escort should be still allowed access to pm, the escort forum and the advert section of the forum.
    You guys need to wait till tomorrow, as my hands are tied regarding this unbanning issue, it will need to be a decision made by management.
    I just think that in the case of paying escorts who are on 2 infractions that they should be allowed 4 before banning and when they hit 3 they get a message that another one will impact on possible work pm's they might have, that way at least they can clear the decks and not piss of any client that was waiting for a promised reply about times dates etc.

  13. #119
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Posts
    1,137
    Reviews
    33

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by lucy chambers View Post
    What he said.
    lol
    very un lucy like !!!

  14. #120

    Default

    Well, I have reported this for discussion as I said I would, but I think banning the escort from the social forums (the forums on the top) only would be easier technically and less long winded.

  15. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to prettywoman For This Useful Post:

    Apollo1 (31-01-11), sweethomes (31-01-11)

Page 12 of 15 FirstFirst ... 21011121314 ... LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •