Why has Shirley been banned??

[prettywoman]

Ok. I will apologize for that comment. It is a serious issue, but I have stated before that in my opinion Shirley has not been infracted for what she said, but how she sad it. And she has received 3 separate infrections for 3 separate occasions, which has led to the system automatically banning her.

[googleplex]

Could even put her in danger if someone felt she was messing them around by not replying to a pm confirm but does not read all this. I would ask that she be unbanned tonight but on the strict understanding she only uses account for work pm's until managers are here, safety first, work second, everything else distant third.

[Rayden]

Ok. I will apologize for that comment. It is a serious issue, but I have stated before that in my opinion Shirley has not been infracted for what she said, but how she sad it. And she has received 3 separate infrections for 3 separate occasions, which has led to the system automatically banning her.

That makes no sense. Surely what she has to say is more important than how she says it. Who cares how she said it?

[sweethomes]

Ok. I will apologize for that comment. It is a serious issue, but I have stated before that in my opinion Shirley has not been infracted for what she said, but how she sad it. And she has received 3 separate infrections for 3 separate occasions, which has led to the system automatically banning her.

For the record , I belive that , if Miley get an infraction as well ! Everything else is just blabla and bla . It was 3 infractions on 1 subject , not 3 , so in my eyes it should count as one and the ban should be lifted immidiatly !
Dont worry I am sitting on the naughtystep while I post this .

[kelso]

That makes no sense. Surely what she has to say is more important than how she says it. Who cares how she said it?

the thought police and tonal police apparently

[Irish Fiona]

Its totally unjust that Shirley be banned with all the shady behavior going on here!!
Private messages?? Are the content of these not private no matter what they hold?? And if you are discussing an issue on the boards and cant say to much, surely a pm is where you continue the discussion to keep it off the boards! Was a gagging order handed out here??

I don't think any person would risk being banned if they felt these issue's were being taken seriously and were being acted on accordingly!

[Forrest]

Having just read the whole thread, am I right in saying that Shirleyy's latest infraction was for saying she was going to pm members with information about another member, and this was considered provocation?
As the contents of pm's are private, how can anyone know what has been said in the pm was, in fact, provocation? How can Shirleyy be guilty without clear proof, as that wouldn't be available unless a member receiving a pm from her reported it? Is that the case?
It seems an extremely harsh infraction under the circumstances?
Another case of jumping the gun?

[Lucy Chambers]

Ok. I will apologize for that comment. It is a serious issue, but I have stated before that in my opinion Shirley has not been infracted for what she said, but how she sad it. And she has received 3 separate infrections for 3 separate occasions, which has led to the system automatically banning her.

I am sorry to tell you this but thats crap.

You can only infract for provocation, bad language, flaming. You cant infract for someone inviting someone to PM them, not unless you have the content of the PM and if we are being really precise you cant infract an escort who defends herself by questioning Mileysweets motives and behavior. Mileysweet is the one that should be dealt with, not Shirleyy. Sorry if it seems as though its a bit of a to do about nothing but it tends to happen when someone is grossly mistreated by people who have no concept of our job, nor the importance of being seen to act in a fair and coherent manner. Doozer infracted Shirleyy for stating facts. You chose to ban an honest escort and protect the guilty.

[Rayden]

Minority Report anyone?

[prettywoman]

You don't need to step on the naughty step, I'm not upset with you.
I do understand, that you guys feel strongly about the case and again, I wasn't here when this all kicked in, so I did not make the decisions. As a general advice, I think to avoid anything like this in the future, it is always worth for the ladies to drop management a pm of any suspicions regarding an other escort, as it may come across as steering the mud.
The reported posts, pm's etc have gone through the system, so it has not gone unnoticed.
As far as unbanning Shirley, management will deal with the issue tomorrow, if they deem it to be unjust, it will get undone...