Agencies and fake profiles

[blazingsaddles]

i guess the advertising dollar is mightier than the posters.....

[Rayden]

i guess the advertising dollar is mightier than the posters.....

Never mind that shit. Here comes Mongo!!

[googleplex]

This ones on 2 different agency sites, both reported

Carla, Dublin Female Agency Escort, profile on Escort Ireland
Carolina, Dublin Female Agency Escort, profile on Escort Ireland

Alena, +7 985 414-1132

[monster_monster]

Never mind that shit. Here comes Mongo!!

PMSL

[aliciasexy]

Should an agency be banned from advertising if they keep posting fake images on their girls profiles?

There is an agency newcomer that has eleven profiles currently on this site and out of that only four do not currently have a fake photo report. Some of the girls even have two.

Seeing as an agency escort is paying the agency for advertising etc. I am assuming that the agency is in control of the profiles on this site. As such, if they keep posting fake photos, should their whole agency profile not be punished instead of just a few of the girls profiles that they manage?

I'd love to hear other ideas on this, especially from the mods/manager

Let´s see.
No just the agency work with fake pictures,the independent´s escort too.
If i don´t want to show my face and body,is up to me,right?
Then i should i get banned for that?

Is just a exemple,i never use fake pictures i don´t need to do that,but i think that if somebody decide to do we have to respect ...

[carlos marvado]

Let´s see.
No just the agency work with fake pictures,the independent´s escort too.
If i don´t want to show my face and body,is up to me,right?
Then i should i get banned for that?

Is just a exemple,i never use fake pictures i don´t need to do that,but i think that if somebody decide to do we have to respect ...

Anybody who does'nt want to show their face or body should just post a cartoon character, a piece of scenery or a photo of the kitchen sink..........lifting pics of other people from other sites and passing them off as oneself is fake advertising, plus it could constitute copyright infringement.

[monster_monster]

Let´s see.
No just the agency work with fake pictures,the independent´s escort too.

I know independents work with fake photos too but that is not the question. What I asked was simply, should an AGENCY be banned for posting fake photos, seeing as they are the ones in control of the escort account

If i don´t want to show my face and body,is up to me,right?

Yes, but we are not talking about people hiding their faces

Then i should i get banned for that?

NO, there are many independents that have their face hidden or blured but use genuine photos, Nikky and Lucy (both use boards) both spring to mind. Again this has nothing to do with the original question, which you have seemed to ignore

[Mature Busty Siobhan]

Anybody who does'nt want to show their face or body should just post a cartoon character, a piece of scenery or a photo of the kitchen sink..........lifting pics of other people from other sites and passing them off as oneself is fake advertising, plus it could constitute copyright infringement.

I'm sure Ikea have copy protection on their sink images too.

[Lucy Chambers]

I know independents work with fake photos too but that is not the question. What I asked was simply, should an AGENCY be banned for posting fake photos, seeing as they are the ones in control of the escort account


Yes, but we are not talking about people hiding their faces


NO, there are many independents that have their face hidden or blured but use genuine photos, Nikky and Lucy (both use boards) both spring to mind. Again this has nothing to do with the original question, which you have seemed to ignore

I think the agency should be penalised, they are the ones responsible for putting the ladies profiles together and so they are in effect are endorsing the pictures. But instead of banned, forced to use verified pictures only. Stringent verification, photographs with copies of newspapers confirming they are in the country and the date.

I have nothing against agencies really, in England they can be very good. The ones here are hilariously cheeky though

[Blond chick NIKKY]

I think the agency should be penalised, they are the ones responsible for putting the ladies profiles together and so they are in effect are endorsing the pictures. But instead of banned, forced to use verified pictures only. Stringent verification, photographs with copies of newspapers confirming they are in the country and the date.

I have nothing against agencies really, in England they can be very good. The ones here are hilariously cheeky though

I think the same. I dont mind them. But they should be penalised and and advertise as agency and not independent. Thats all. Why banned them? They will find other way how to do it.