Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 43

Thread: Brand New Trusted Reviewer Criteria for 2011

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    2,552
    Reviews
    6

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by JAMESCORK View Post
    Thanks Ric.. the list of TRs is very helpful..

    But I fail to see how this is any different from the previous criteria. If anything it is the same but more stringent, As far as I can remember there was a request for TR badges to be automatically allocated to certain reviewers that meet the criteria without the need to apply. It is the reluctance for good reviewers to apply or the request references from escorts was at the root of the problem previously...

    Look ,that’s just my opinion, I have said my piece....
    James man , eventually you will realise that suggestions here are never taken on board ...especially when the key advisors to the site are missing in action. In fairness you suggested good changes and they were not taken on board and the reviews and reviewers are still left in the hands of n*******

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Posts
    2,965
    Reviews
    6

    Default

    It is points 4 & 5 that have F***ed me again!

    I can see the person I will be getting black ball from every time in point 6.

    Didnt want to be in your club anyway!

    All Trusted Reviewers are TOSSERS!!!
    Last edited by dannyboy10; 22-01-11 at 10:31. Reason: Thats the end of that! :)

  3. The Following User Says Thank You to dannyboy10 For This Useful Post:

    dave1dave (22-01-11)

  4. #3
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Posts
    2,209
    Reviews
    43

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by dannyboy10 View Post
    It is points 4 & 5 that have F***ed me again!

    I can see the person I will be getting black ball from every time in point 6.

    Didnt want to be in your club anyway!

    All Trusted Reviewers are TOSSERS!!!
    Danny, I'm sure you will be a TR, within next few months (not that I am calling you a tosser by the way).
    Just send Shirley and Lucy over - they would be too afraid to reject you after that visit!
    Last edited by Sam Spade; 22-01-11 at 10:42.

  5. #4
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    3,916
    Blog Entries
    1
    Reviews
    33

    Default

    Wow, only 44 active TRs. I really had no idea there were so few. For such a big site we really need to get some more.
    Just for clarity can I add that the written review that an applicant needs from three escorts is via the Pm system. You don't have to go around with pen, paper and envelopes !

  6. #5
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Posts
    2,965
    Reviews
    6

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by dave1dave View Post
    Wow, only 44 active TRs. I really had no idea there were so few. For such a big site we really need to get some more.
    Just for clarity can I add that the written review that an applicant needs from three escorts is via the Pm system. You don't have to go around with pen, paper and envelopes !
    I got the Ladies to review me by hiring a sky writting plane!
    Over the top???

  7. #6

    Default

    I think it should be by private poll.

    Stick there name up, and let the forum decide if they trust them or not.
    If life gives you lemons ask for Tequila

    Only sad bastards seek gratification from signatures

  8. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Lucy Chambers For This Useful Post:

    JAMESCORK (22-01-11), Rayden (22-01-11), Sensual Delights (22-01-11)

  9. #7
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Posts
    1,300
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by lucy chambers View Post
    I think it should be by private poll.

    Stick there name up, and let the forum decide if they trust them or not.

    Kinda similar with my own idea. "Being trusted by whom?" is the question.

    Many times, decent guys will apply for the badge, so Ric and Highwayman will not be far from the truth with their approvals. However, they will have a very small percentage of what "trusted" means from the big majority.

  10. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Sensual Delights For This Useful Post:

    JAMESCORK (22-01-11), Lucy Chambers (22-01-11)

  11. #8

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by lucy chambers View Post
    I think it should be by private poll.

    Stick there name up, and let the forum decide if they trust them or not.
    problem being everyone with multiple aliases votes for thereself or buddy

  12. #9
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    3,916
    Blog Entries
    1
    Reviews
    33

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by dannyboy10 View Post
    I got the Ladies to review me by hiring a sky writting plane!
    Over the top???
    Not in the least. I'm sure they didn't have much to say

  13. The Following User Says Thank You to dave1dave For This Useful Post:

    dannyboy10 (22-01-11)

  14. #10

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by dave1dave View Post
    Not in the least. I'm sure they didn't have much to say
    Surprisingly little
    If life gives you lemons ask for Tequila

    Only sad bastards seek gratification from signatures

  15. The Following User Says Thank You to Lucy Chambers For This Useful Post:

    dave1dave (22-01-11)

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •