dave1dave (22-01-11)
Rayden (22-01-11)
Kinda similar with my own idea. "Being trusted by whom?" is the question.
Many times, decent guys will apply for the badge, so Ric and Highwayman will not be far from the truth with their approvals. However, they will have a very small percentage of what "trusted" means from the big majority.
JAMESCORK (22-01-11), Lucy Chambers (22-01-11)
Last edited by lucy chambers; 22-01-11 at 11:20.
If life gives you lemons ask for Tequila
Only sad bastards seek gratification from signatures
Truth be told the opposite is what scuppered me!
Nicole was very tired when she reviewd the application and started to read Lucys review!
Well you know how she goes on and on YAK YAK YAK! (in person, in a very loud voice).
So Nicole decided that rather than read 6 pages of rambling she dropped the black ball and went home early!
True story!!
There is a small risk, yes. But how many alias do you think people got here? And what's stopping the others that don't agree to have also multiple aliases ?
The chance for this to affect a pool is quite low.
And if someone deems it a little higher then my opinion, then it can be an open poll with visible username voting. The aliases we are aware will be spotted easily then. And if we are not aware of them, tough luck for us, it wouldn't bother us anyway.
If life gives you lemons ask for Tequila
Only sad bastards seek gratification from signatures
Not interested sorry, especially if I have to post a lot to qualify.
Its up to the reader to use their intelligence to judge whether a review is dependable or not. Best guide for me is if the reviewer has reviewed an escort that you have previously met and it is in line with your experience. Not much use for the first timer but works for me.
Still, best of luck.
S.
dave1dave (22-01-11), JAMESCORK (22-01-11), Lucy Chambers (22-01-11)