Results 1 to 10 of 22

Thread: banning system

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Posts
    2,965
    Reviews
    6

    Default

    Wodering that myself as I was called a C**T and retarded C**T on three threads and Pm yesterday without even a hash word being issued by management.

    Then I saw some members being banned for what I saw was an inoffensive comment!

    I guess all animals are equal, it is just some are more equal than others"!

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Posts
    31,568

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by dannyboy10 View Post
    Wodering that myself as I was called a C**T and retarded C**T on three threads and Pm yesterday without even a hash word being issued by management.

    Then I saw some members being banned for what I saw was an inoffensive comment!

    I guess all animals are equal, it is just some are more equal than others"!
    But then again, this was provoked against the rules of the particular forum that the rules of which were broken, and action was not taken on either party.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    36,558
    Blog Entries
    15
    Reviews
    53

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by dannyboy10 View Post
    Wodering that myself as I was called a C**T and retarded C**T on three threads and Pm yesterday without even a hash word being issued by management.

    Then I saw some members being banned for what I saw was an inoffensive comment!

    I guess all animals are equal, it is just some are more equal than others"!
    Missed that kitty, what thread .: doc
    Never mistake kindness for weakness .: doc

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Posts
    31,568

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by dr love View Post
    Missed that kitty, what thread .: doc
    He's referring to an incident yesterday when a poster was upset by the mocking of his client request, and out of retaliation, chose to swear at the offender on the boards. I felt that this issue was resolved as two wrongs don't make a right.

  5. The Following User Says Thank You to samlad For This Useful Post:

    dr love (18-01-11)

  6. #5
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    36,558
    Blog Entries
    15
    Reviews
    53

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by samlad View Post
    He's referring to an incident yesterday when a poster was upset by the mocking of his client request, and out of retaliation, chose to swear at the offender on the boards. I felt that this issue was resolved as two wrongs don't make a right.
    Correct samlad I know now , it's the pm caught my interest .: doc
    Never mistake kindness for weakness .: doc

  7. #6
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Posts
    31,568

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by dr love View Post
    Correct samlad I know now , it's the pm caught my interest .: doc
    No PM was reported unfortunatley, doc.

  8. #7
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    36,558
    Blog Entries
    15
    Reviews
    53

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by samlad View Post
    No PM was reported unfortunatley, doc.
    They are noting paying you enough sam . Regards doc
    Never mistake kindness for weakness .: doc

  9. #8
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Posts
    2,965
    Reviews
    6

    Default

    Well Sam two wrong do not make a right! (That was my point!)
    I posted a light hearted thread yesturday which you posted was inappropriate!
    I hope you agree that it was not a bad minded post Doc Love and Mark can comment!
    I said sorry and stated no offence was meant to the person in the request forum!
    I was then in at least two threads called a stupid C**T by the person concerned!
    I then recieved a PM in which I was told to go F**K Yourself you stupid retarded C**T!
    I (going against type) remained calm and did not rise to it, expecting action to be taken as it has on many occassions!
    Instead most of the abusive comments were removed and there was a calm dow gents comment!
    I inquired of you if any action was to be taken in relation to the matter to which you gave the above response. So no warning even given to the gent!
    I stated on the forum and by PM that I had gotten an abusive PM, so to say it was not reported is a little disingenious Sam IMO!

    Now I am not too bothered about the comments but what I am perturbed about is the inconsistant application of the rules!

    I know you did not take any action against me in relation to the post, but as said it was not intended to offend and you told us to quit it, which I did with a sorry no offence intended reply!

    You had dealt with the situation and if the gentleman concerned had an issue he should have reported me to you and not have doled out the abuse he did on several occassions!

    Sam I am not trying to get into an arguement but if what was said to me was said to other members here action would have been taken IMO!

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •