"trusted" reviewer(s)

[Lucy Chambers]

if you mean debest i think hes back from suspension

For now. I will give it four days.

[releasetherat]

thanks for the replies everyone the point i was trying to make was the word "trusted" and the implications of using such a word.
looking through some other trusted review threads it would seem that its a
boys back slapping club
if you post on forums alot and are good then you get one
the badge is given to some "wakners" who expect extra time with ladies.

personally i only trust the face i shave in the morning but thanks all for replying and find a better word than "trusted"

[Sam Spade]

thanks for the replies everyone the point i was trying to make was the word "trusted" and the implications of using such a word.
looking through some other trusted review threads it would seem that its a
boys back slapping club
if you post on forums alot and are good then you get one
the badge is given to some "wakners" who expect extra time with ladies.

personally i only trust the face i shave in the morning but thanks all for replying and find a better word than "trusted"

I don't think anyone can generalise in this way, as the system was set up with good intentions.
Personally I don't care about what something or someone is called as long as the principles are sound.

All walks of life have personalities good and bad, this online community is no different.
If there is a problem with an individual reviewer taking advantage of his position, then I would hope methods are in place to investigate and remove the badge where the allocation is proven.

Nothing is perfect in this world, the best we can hope for is continually improve and develop this system for everyones benefit.

That is my hope anyway

[hornylimerick]

thanks for the replies everyone the point i was trying to make was the word "trusted" and the implications of using such a word.
looking through some other trusted review threads it would seem that its a
boys back slapping club
if you post on forums alot and are good then you get one
the badge is given to some "wakners" who expect extra time with ladies.

personally i only trust the face i shave in the morning but thanks all for replying and find a better word than "trusted"

I personally think "trusted reviewers" badge is a good idea, me for one would always put more weight in reviews with a badge beside them, but that's just me, I have found them more accurate and I know they more than likely are legitimate.

As for trusted reviewer being wankers, I can only speak for myself, I am a wanker as I masturbate quite regulary, in a lot of peoples opinions I am the other meaning of the word too and I can't really deny that
Do I ask or expect more from an escort because of the badge? Absolutely NOT! Most girls wouldn't even be aware I am one and I expect to be treated no differently than any other punter, sure there are girls who do treat me different, which is nice but it has nothing to do with the badge.
In the end it's just a badge that's given to someone who is believed to give honest, reliable and accurate reviews, whether that is true or not, in my experience 9/10 times it is, reviews are only an indication of what you can expect when you visit an escort, they're someones opinion and as in everyday life there are people who's opinions I agree with and those I don't.

All you can do in the end Is read reviews and make your mind up for yourself, as you go you'll find people who's reviews you will come to trust.

[takemedrunkimhome]

I mentioned this on the other thread before it disappeared, but I was just wondering what everyone else thought about it.

As it is the actual escort that meets the punters and not the mods or the fellow punters, I think the escorts should have more imput in to who is "trusted" and who isnt.

The reference tab doesnt seem to be utilised to its full potential. Maybe a figure could be agreed by the mods, lets say 10 for example, and after 10 escort references the user couold get his badge.

It seems like if 10 escorts can refer a client he has to be doing something write, plus it saves three of those girls having to send in a pm to the mods to say in a few lines what they have already said by referring them.

Its just a thought but I would be interested to hear what everyone thinks.

[releasetherat]

As it is the actual escort that meets the punters and not the mods or the fellow punters, I think the escorts should have more imput in to who is "trusted" and who isnt.

The reference tab doesnt seem to be utilised to its full potential. Maybe a figure could be agreed by the mods, lets say 10 for example, and after 10 escort references the user couold get his badge.

It seems like if 10 escorts can refer a client he has to be doing something write, plus it saves three of those girls having to send in a pm to the mods to say in a few lines what they have already said by referring them.

Its just a thought but I would be interested to hear what everyone thinks.

this would certanly justify the "trusted" status more than the current format.

[Morpheus]

??????????????????????????

Is this just spam? Or is someone taking the piss?

[Rayden]

??????????????????????????

Is this just spam? Or is someone taking the piss?

Seen another thread bumped with a pile of Russian the other day.

[Lincoln]

At the end of the day the only person whose opinion I really trust is my own, that being said I would put a good deal of stock in the reviews of the above mentioned regulars.

Anyway I'm just back from yet another sweet appointment with the unfeasibly gorgeous Tina in Dublin and I'm as happy as a pig in shite and everything is ok with the world.