Page 16 of 18 FirstFirst ... 61415161718 LastLast
Results 151 to 160 of 179

Thread: Face shot for verification!

  1. #151
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Posts
    2,662
    Reviews
    5

    Default

    Any chance of putting a sock init, there only seems to be few writing in relation to this post at eachothers throats, thers lots of profiles with unverified pics fake or not , so whats so special bout this 1 profile that its came to this, better just leaving it to the moderators and see what they say or do about it after all it is there job, and if a girl does not want to send a face pic well whats ther problem, only person it will effect will be herself as she will get less clients or reviews, so dont see why her profile should be banned if it is,and if this a new thing introduced well i say the mods ban every other profile with unverified pics,all for 1 and 1 for all, enought said on this subject on my behalf.

  2. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to skywalker85 For This Useful Post:

    herodotus (26-12-10), hornylimerick (26-12-10)

  3. #152
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Posts
    5,353

    Default

    As i have already posted on another thread...

    The verification process requires Ad Staff to be able to confirm that the girl in the pictures is real and not fake etc. To do this, we require a verification picture with the girl holding the paper saying EI and the date on etc. We verify from clothes, body markings , face etc.

    The particular problem with these pictures, were that they have been edited in various ways, which make them look fake.

    New verification pic and pictures were required to see they were genuine pics taken by the girl, as on the pics we had we couldbnt verify them.
    It was explained unless they were provided we would not verify.

    Its pretty clear, and these rules have been the rules for several years, so this is nothing new.

    It is up to the girl if she wants to be verified, she has to be able to provide orginal photos that have not been doctored in any way and we will verify.

  4. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to vampirejackie For This Useful Post:

    kelly curvybabe (27-12-10), Doozer (27-12-10)

  5. #153
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    16,753
    Reviews
    57

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by vampirejackie View Post
    As i have already posted on another thread...

    The verification process requires Ad Staff to be able to confirm that the girl in the pictures is real and not fake etc. To do this, we require a verification picture with the girl holding the paper saying EI and the date on etc. We verify from clothes, body markings , face etc.

    The particular problem with these pictures, were that they have been edited in various ways, which make them look fake.

    New verification pic and pictures were required to see they were genuine pics taken by the girl, as on the pics we had we couldn't verify them.
    It was explained unless they were provided we would not verify.

    Its pretty clear, and these rules have been the rules for several years, so this is nothing new.

    It is up to the girl if she wants to be verified, she has to be able to provide original photos that have not been doctored in any way and we will verify.
    I think the rule is pretty clear to everyone except those that want to circumvent it for there own gain..
    On a side note is it OK for an escort to claim to be a normal poster in one thread and then say she is actually an escort and has a profile on this site (obviously I'm speaking about Alexanda)? Surely hiding behind a board profile to champion lost causes isn't allowed, how do we know she hasn't got an escort board profile also where she is being all nice and loving

  6. #154
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Posts
    5,353

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by anon361 View Post
    I think the rule is pretty clear to everyone except those that want to circumvent it for there own gain..
    On a side note is it OK for an escort to claim to be a normal poster in one thread and then say she is actually an escort and has a profile on this site (obviously I'm speaking about Alexanda)? Surely hiding behind a board profile to champion lost causes isn't allowed, how do we know she hasn't got an escort board profile also where she is being all nice and loving
    It is up to an escort if she wants to link her message board ID to her escort profile or not. There is no requirement on this, unless they want to advertise using the advert forums, or use the escort areas on the boards.

  7. The Following User Says Thank You to vampirejackie For This Useful Post:

    alexanda (27-12-10)

  8. #155
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    5,436
    Reviews
    9

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by alexanda View Post
    She did sent a pic of her body with the same outfit shes wearing on profile pics..If she would be stoled those pics how could she send a pic with the same outfit and a paper with her name on it?
    Ok, I have'nt read this whole thread yet, so maybe somebody else has already made this particular suggestion.

    From what I've read, the escort is question does not have any face pics on her advertising photographs........so basically any client is looking at a number of body shots in whatever state of undress. A face shot for verification purposes may or may not enable Ad Staff to confirm the veracity of the body shots. The clients are mainly interested in whether the photos that are actually displayed in the advertising profile really are those of the escort in question. Surely a photo of the escort (body shot), wearing the same items of clothing, with the same tattoos showing (if any), with the exact same background if possible, and additionally taken with her holding up the piece of paper with "For Escort Ireland" or "For E-I" together with the date would serve as a better verification photo given the type of advertising photos that are to be verified.

    I realise that this does not get around the situation of an escort who loans or sells her profile to another escort, but a face verification pic won't achieve this either.

    The face verification pic is probably essential when photos that contain face shots are the subject for verification, but I can't see the necessity of this when body only pics are to be verified.

  9. #156

    Default

    that would seem to be the logical method a face pic can hardly verify a body pic

  10. #157

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by carlos marvado View Post
    I realise that this does not get around the situation of an escort who loans or sells her profile to another escort, but a face verification pic won't achieve this either.

    The face verification pic is probably essential when photos that contain face shots are the subject for verification, but I can't see the necessity of this when body only pics are to be verified.
    A faceshot could help in identifiying sold profiles as well.
    If you have for example an escort who bought a good profile and suddenly gets a lot of bad reviews. The advert team could than require the ecort to send a new faceshot and they could compare it with the old one.
    Or the advert team could require regular new faceshots (e.g. if the escort was absent for a longer time or has major changes to her profile, or similar).

  11. #158
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    5,436
    Reviews
    9

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Michi72 View Post
    A faceshot could help in identifiying sold profiles as well.
    If you have for example an escort who bought a good profile and suddenly gets a lot of bad reviews. The advert team could than require the ecort to send a new faceshot and they could compare it with the old one.
    Or the advert team could require regular new faceshots (e.g. if the escort was absent for a longer time or has major changes to her profile, or similar).
    In the first case Escort B would just have to get Escort A (the escort who sold or lent her the profile) to submit a new verification photograph of herself.

    The second case makes sense if an escort is using photos that show her face in her advertisement. An up to date facial pic for verification would show if the other pictures were on the older side or to what extent they had been touched up.

    In some instances, where reviewers or members posting in the warning section point out that they know or suspect that profiles are being swapped or changed either by agencies or independent escorts, the inability to furnish updated verification photos may actually tell more than the ability to do this.

  12. #159

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by carlos marvado View Post
    In the first case Escort B would just have to get Escort A (the escort who sold or lent her the profile) to submit a new verification photograph of herself.
    If ecort A is still in Ireland, that might be easy, but i would imagine that most of the times the selling Escort might have left Ireland already, so it might not be as easy for Escort b to get hold of her, to get a new picture from her.

  13. #160
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    5,436
    Reviews
    9

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Michi72 View Post
    If ecort A is still in Ireland, that might be easy, but i would imagine that most of the times the selling Escort might have left Ireland already, so it might not be as easy for Escort b to get hold of her, to get a new picture from her.
    In this age of technology, once they have each others numbers stored on their mobiles and email addresses on their laptops, one escort can take a verification photo of herself anyplace and send it by email to the escort who requires it for her advert. As I said, the fact that a verification photo cannot be provided possibly tells you more then when one can be provided.

Page 16 of 18 FirstFirst ... 61415161718 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •