Are Escorts compelled to carry out their services

[JAMESCORK]

It was Irish Ciaras recent thread that reminded me of a conversation I had had recently with a regular escort that made me consider… how far should an escort have go to fulfil her side of the bargain, in providing the services she advertises. We as punters have the ultimate choice advantage, because we can examine a profile and decide whether we want to, or not, have intimacies with the girl advertised. But the girls do not at all have the same luxury of choice. They have to welcome whatever comes through that door. Is it reasonable therefore for the ladies to have to accept a mediocre/bad review, based on the fact that they were required to service an ugly, smelly or obnoxious client?

What is acceptable I ask when it comes to offering a service as they do?. How many girls struggle to be pleasant when presented with a client that is anything but pleasant. How many girls struggle to fulfil their side of the contract knowing that they are totally uncomfortable with the client before them? Are they allowed to have an off day, or an off meeting? Should they be compelled to teabag a client that has just had a dump in their loo without showering afterwards? FFS.

It amazes me at times that these young ladies put up with so much shit and don’t more often say ‘fuck this for as game of soldiers’. To advertise FK and have to kiss every man that hands you 100 Euros must be difficult. To advertise OWO and to feel obliged to take a smelly cock into your mouth is unbelievable. When we read bad/mediocre reviews based on dissatisfaction with aforementioned services do we consider what these Escorts have to put up with on a day to day basis. Or is this their chosen work and ‘get over it’. Hmmm.

Discuss…..