Originally Posted by
carlos marvado
I've just read Doozer's answer to that question, and I'm happy to go along with what he posted. You need a method of getting as close as possible to a 100% accurate result, or better still, one should base decisions on information gathered from different sources and using different methods.
But DNA testing is not 100%, but we rely on this method as part of the evidence gathering process....??
Perhaps the lawyers and judges don't want the competition, which is what lie detector usage would be
GL
"Keep it real with me, and I'll keep it real with you"