Seeing as the type of attack it was i thought it probably was related to Vilks cartoon
There are several ways of looking at this,was making a point which he knew full well
(after the danish incident) was going to provoke a serious outrage now worth it?
We all value the right of freedom of speech but on serious issues not cartoons,do the
people after being blown up because of this think it was worth it? fine if it was his own
neck he was putting on the line but he is an intelligent man he knows how these terrorists
act and it was unlikely he would be the one paying the price.
I wonder how does he feel today ? does he regret what he did or is he still of the belief
that innocent people get blown up so he can make a point is for the greater good. Wouldnt
it have been better in a game where peoples lives can be at stake to let it rest and let it
slide, if he wanted there are plenty other fights to pick