Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 97

Thread: Piss taking in the review system

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    21,994
    Reviews
    113

    Default

    Time span yes but enforcing post not pratical.

  2. The Following User Says Thank You to JAMESCORK For This Useful Post:

    An don (20-11-10)

  3. #2
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Posts
    281
    Reviews
    11

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by JAMESCORK View Post
    Time span yes but enforcing post not pratical.
    Yep, you'll just end up with lots of spam posts.

  4. #3

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Bodkin View Post
    Yep, you'll just end up with lots of spam posts.
    For the record I don't think that clients should have minimum post count. I am just chuffed if they get to the computer to review.
    If life gives you lemons ask for Tequila

    Only sad bastards seek gratification from signatures

  5. #4
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    13,265

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by An don View Post
    With all the fake reviews lately from "registered to leave review" brigade, is it time for E-I to adopt as policy of making new users to wait a set length of time before reviewing. I don't think the pming new users is working.


    Thank you for you sugestion An Don. I will have a discussion about it with Sam and Jackie.
    What is the time length would you propose??? This is just question as I would like to know whats your and other posters thoughts about this matter.

  6. #5
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Posts
    679
    Reviews
    13

    Default

    How about 4 weeks or 10 posts which ever comes sooner!

    Quote Originally Posted by Nicole View Post
    Thank you for you sugestion An Don. I will have a discussion about it with Sam and Jackie.
    What is the time length would you propose??? This is just question as I would like to know whats your and other posters thoughts about this matter.

  7. #6
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    13,265

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by herodotus View Post
    How about 4 weeks or 10 posts which ever comes sooner!

    Im taking notes H Thank you.

  8. #7
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    21,994
    Reviews
    113

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Nicole View Post
    Thank you for you sugestion An Don. I will have a discussion about it with Sam and Jackie.
    What is the time length would you propose??? This is just question as I would like to know whats your and other posters thoughts about this matter.
    I hadn’t realized there was a policy of PMing new users on their first review. Sounds like a good idea really. I suppose it is a step towards weeding out fakes. I received a PM last night from an Escort concerning the TR thread and she expressed her frustration at the fact that so few review. We really should be encouraging reviews rather than discouraging. But I also do see the point in trying to police it better. You could ask Escorts to use the comment on review system more but then again as pointed out before not all Escorts use the internet while they tour. Tricky one….

  9. #8
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    13,265

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by JAMESCORK View Post
    I hadn’t realized there was a policy of PMing new users on their first review. Sounds like a good idea really. I suppose it is a step towards weeding out fakes. I received a PM last night from an Escort concerning the TR thread and she expressed her frustration at the fact that so few review. We really should be encouraging reviews rather than discouraging. But I also do see the point in trying to police it better. You could ask Escorts to use the comment on review system more but then again as pointed out before not all Escorts use the internet while they tour. Tricky one….
    Reviews subject is tricky James. Our review Mods do great job in contacting new reviewers. I do agree with James and think we can't turn review system in witch hunt. However I do undersand frustration with fake reviews and rats.

  10. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Nicole For This Useful Post:

    JohnRambo (21-11-10), mr maxi (20-11-10)

  11. #9

    Default

    One week would be better, maybe. And then a confirmation email sent to escort as well if poss, but the review could be put online without that if it was deemed plausible. It may also stop people leaving heat of the moment reviews.
    If life gives you lemons ask for Tequila

    Only sad bastards seek gratification from signatures

  12. The Following User Says Thank You to Lucy Chambers For This Useful Post:

    Nicole (20-11-10)

  13. #10
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    21,994
    Reviews
    113

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by lucy chambers View Post
    One week would be better, maybe. And then a confirmation email sent to escort as well if poss, but the review could be put online without that if it was deemed plausible. It may also stop people leaving heat of the moment reviews.
    That would be the email in lanuage of the escorts choice, right?

    (Hee hee only taking the piss Honey... )

Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •