Page 3 of 10 FirstFirst 12345 ... LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 98

Thread: Piss taking in the review system

  1. #21
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    13,265

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by lucy chambers View Post
    Nor should it be. It would be too easy for a lady to say she wasnt somewhere in order to dodge the review. It is possible to cross reference the location of appointment with e-i advertising, they know where we were advertising on any given day.

    True Lucy, in this case we chat with Ad Staff to find out if escort wasnt really in stated location.

  2. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Nicole For This Useful Post:

    Lucy Chambers (20-11-10), TiffanyTees (20-11-10)

  3. #22

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by An don View Post
    The point is that if 50% of them wont wait isnt is worth while to have 50% less rats. Every little idea helps to make the system better. Its not a perfect solution, its just one of many rattling around in my head.

    As some one else suggested waiting for ten posts , i have to disagree with this because as Doozer suggested alot of reveiwers dont partake in the forum . And besides you can chalk up in ten posts in the likes of the "drop one " threads in a small amount of time.

    As for alienating new reviewers , i honestly feel that if some registers and cant wait a set length of time to review , the system is better off without them.
    Do you mean that most ladies are only here for a short time and therefore it wouldn't be worth the fake review? I'm sorry I am a bit blonde today.
    If life gives you lemons ask for Tequila

    Only sad bastards seek gratification from signatures

  4. #23
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    13,142
    Reviews
    14

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Nicole View Post
    Agree with Doozer, many guys just register to leave reviews, ( I didnt see scankman to post a lot).
    I think he only posted once on the boards.
    The Truth is out there.

  5. #24
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    2,552
    Reviews
    6

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by lucy chambers View Post
    Do you mean that most ladies are only here for a short time and therefore it wouldn't be worth the fake review? I'm sorry I am a bit blonde today.
    Yes Ms Chambers.

    I thinking more of a 2 week cooling off period myself.

  6. #25
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Posts
    679
    Reviews
    13

    Default

    But, I am still wondering about this. If, after the chat with the ad staff it is clear that a girl was not in the location stated in the review shouldn't the review be considered fake?

    Quote Originally Posted by Nicole View Post
    True Lucy, in this case we chat with Ad Staff to find out if escort wasnt really in stated location.

  7. #26
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    13,265

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by westcorklad View Post
    I think he only posted once on the boards.

    Yeah that's correct, what I wanted to say was guy's not always want to play on message boards, many of them just register to be able to leave reviews.
    As I say before it is tricky with reviews.

  8. #27

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by An don View Post
    Yes Ms Chambers.

    I thinking more of a 2 week cooling off period myself.
    Eeek, hold on, some clients will have forgotten our names in two weeks! I agree there should be a cooling off period, but not south pole cool.

    10 days. Happy medium?
    Also I think once the reviewer is approved there should still be occasional checks- in the form of confirmation emails sent to the lady.
    If life gives you lemons ask for Tequila

    Only sad bastards seek gratification from signatures

  9. #28
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Posts
    679
    Reviews
    13

    Default

    Ok, but if after the chat with the ad staff surely it is clear that the girl either was or was not in the stated location. If she wasn't then the review is surely fake?

    Quote Originally Posted by Nicole View Post
    True Lucy, in this case we chat with Ad Staff to find out if escort wasnt really in stated location.

  10. #29
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    2,552
    Reviews
    6

    Default

    Would people stop mentioning about Posting on the forum before they review , that had nothing to do with what i suggested. You not make someone post on the forum in order to leave a review . Some of the best reviewers here have no interest in posting on the forum.
    Last edited by An don; 20-11-10 at 14:10.

  11. The Following User Says Thank You to An don For This Useful Post:

    Lucy Chambers (20-11-10)

  12. #30
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Posts
    679
    Reviews
    13

    Default

    Ok, but what is the use of a review from a reviewer who only registers to leave a review waits the ten days and never reviews again. I am not sure how useful this would be to anyone, as people are often a bit dubious about reviewers who only have 1 review.

    Quote Originally Posted by lucy chambers View Post
    Eeek, hold on, some clients will have forgotten our names in two weeks! I agree there should be a cooling off period, but not south pole cool.

    10 days. Happy medium?
    Also I think once the reviewer is approved there should still be occasional checks- in the form of confirmation emails sent to the lady.

Page 3 of 10 FirstFirst 12345 ... LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •