Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 97

Thread: Piss taking in the review system

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    13,265

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Doozer View Post
    I agree in theory but a lot of punters dont realy take part on the boards they just see escorts and leave reviews and we would be alieanating them

    Agree with Doozer, many guys just register to leave reviews, ( I didnt see scankman to post a lot).

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    13,142
    Reviews
    14

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Nicole View Post
    Agree with Doozer, many guys just register to leave reviews, ( I didnt see scankman to post a lot).
    I think he only posted once on the boards.
    The Truth is out there.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    13,265

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by westcorklad View Post
    I think he only posted once on the boards.

    Yeah that's correct, what I wanted to say was guy's not always want to play on message boards, many of them just register to be able to leave reviews.
    As I say before it is tricky with reviews.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Posts
    679
    Reviews
    13

    Default

    Firstly, nothing is going to stop people leaving fake reviews. But it would certainly help if it was a little more difficult to do so and putting some sort of time limit on new users befor they are allowed to post reviews makes perfect sense and presumably it would take almost no additional work for the reviews mods as there would just be a moving wall for all new users.


    Quote Originally Posted by KellyCurvybabe View Post
    This really won't stop them

    As they will just register wait the time then post the fake reviews anyway

    So wots the point

    if there going to post a fake review they are going to do wot ever it takes to post it

    We just need nbt and qph back as they were able to spot the fakes and were not scared of ratting

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    2,552
    Reviews
    6

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by KellyCurvybabe View Post
    This really won't stop them

    As they will just register wait the time then post the fake reviews anyway

    So wots the point
    The point is that if 50% of them wont wait isnt is worth while to have 50% less rats. Every little idea helps to make the system better. Its not a perfect solution, its just one of many rattling around in my head.

    As some one else suggested waiting for ten posts , i have to disagree with this because as Doozer suggested alot of reveiwers dont partake in the forum . And besides you can chalk up in ten posts in the likes of the "drop one " threads in a small amount of time.

    As for alienating new reviewers , i honestly feel that if some registers and cant wait a set length of time to review , the system is better off without them.

  6. #6

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by An don View Post
    The point is that if 50% of them wont wait isnt is worth while to have 50% less rats. Every little idea helps to make the system better. Its not a perfect solution, its just one of many rattling around in my head.

    As some one else suggested waiting for ten posts , i have to disagree with this because as Doozer suggested alot of reveiwers dont partake in the forum . And besides you can chalk up in ten posts in the likes of the "drop one " threads in a small amount of time.

    As for alienating new reviewers , i honestly feel that if some registers and cant wait a set length of time to review , the system is better off without them.
    Do you mean that most ladies are only here for a short time and therefore it wouldn't be worth the fake review? I'm sorry I am a bit blonde today.
    If life gives you lemons ask for Tequila

    Only sad bastards seek gratification from signatures

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    2,552
    Reviews
    6

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by lucy chambers View Post
    Do you mean that most ladies are only here for a short time and therefore it wouldn't be worth the fake review? I'm sorry I am a bit blonde today.
    Yes Ms Chambers.

    I thinking more of a 2 week cooling off period myself.

  8. #8

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by An don View Post
    Yes Ms Chambers.

    I thinking more of a 2 week cooling off period myself.
    Eeek, hold on, some clients will have forgotten our names in two weeks! I agree there should be a cooling off period, but not south pole cool.

    10 days. Happy medium?
    Also I think once the reviewer is approved there should still be occasional checks- in the form of confirmation emails sent to the lady.
    If life gives you lemons ask for Tequila

    Only sad bastards seek gratification from signatures

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    2,552
    Reviews
    6

    Default

    Would people stop mentioning about Posting on the forum before they review , that had nothing to do with what i suggested. You not make someone post on the forum in order to leave a review . Some of the best reviewers here have no interest in posting on the forum.
    Last edited by An don; 20-11-10 at 14:10.

  10. The Following User Says Thank You to An don For This Useful Post:

    Lucy Chambers (20-11-10)

  11. #10
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Posts
    1,422
    Reviews
    29

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by An don View Post
    With all the fake reviews lately from "registered to leave review" brigade, is it time for E-I to adopt as policy of making new users to wait a set length of time before reviewing. I don't think the pming new users is working.
    A most sensible suggestion - I tend to disregard any "registered on the same day" reviews.

Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •