Results 1 to 5 of 5

Thread: Ratted Reviews

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Posts
    31,794

    Default Ratted Reviews

    Hello everyone,

    As reviews seem to be the main focus at the moment, I fee it would be appropriate to explain our stance on ratted reviews.

    Okay, please be aware that the rat is not just symbollic of the escort; it can also be symbollic of the reviewer and vice versa. A rat does not always mean that a review is fake either, it can be an indication that there may have been some suspicious activity at some point from either client or escort.

    As a rule, we do not remove ratted reviews. They are a reference point of a paticular point in time. If a client or escort has their doubts about a particular review, we would advise that the other reviews are checked in order to gain a better perspective of things.

    For example, there may have been a client that has submitted a fake review on one girl, but has several other genuine reviews. After investigation, this may result in all of the reviews ratted based on the information we can collate, but it should not be a reflection on the escort, especially if he/she has several positive reviews. This can also happen if the escort has been found to have various fake reviews and a client may have had a genuine review ratted also.

    I hope this helps to clarify things.

  2. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to samlad For This Useful Post:

    Bangman (19-11-10), Doozer (19-11-10), JohnRambo (19-11-10), Nicole (19-11-10)

  3. #2
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    Halicarnassus
    Posts
    683
    Reviews
    13

    Default

    I am not sure that this clarifies anything other than the fact that the system has a number of flaws.

    And to say that the rat is not symbolic of the escort is not true as that is the impression that most people would take from it. I would tend to look at the review and might come to the conclusion that it is the reviewer who is the rat but I am sure that I am in the minority.

    I dont want to go through all the points that I disagree with in this post as that would make me look bad but I think yoiu might need another go to clarify this issue
    Quote Originally Posted by samlad View Post
    Hello everyone,

    As reviews seem to be the main focus at the moment, I fee it would be appropriate to explain our stance on ratted reviews.

    Okay, please be aware that the rat is not just symbollic of the escort; it can also be symbollic of the reviewer and vice versa. A rat does not always mean that a review is fake either, it can be an indication that there may have been some suspicious activity at some point from either client or escort.

    As a rule, we do not remove ratted reviews. They are a reference point of a paticular point in time. If a client or escort has their doubts about a particular review, we would advise that the other reviews are checked in order to gain a better perspective of things.

    For example, there may have been a client that has submitted a fake review on one girl, but has several other genuine reviews. After investigation, this may result in all of the reviews ratted based on the information we can collate, but it should not be a reflection on the escort, especially if he/she has several positive reviews. This can also happen if the escort has been found to have various fake reviews and a client may have had a genuine review ratted also.

    I hope this helps to clarify things.

  4. #3
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    5,856
    Blog Entries
    109

    Default referencing

    Well folks

    with regarding leaving ratted reviews as a reference

    I for one was against this before, as I had a very degrading one that had been proven false and it came from an agency (same ips) which some folk believed I may add , and it took 3 years yes 3 to be taken off.

    I must say I donít ask for reviews ever, because at the end of the day we donít want happening here, what happened to punternet do we ?

    to the gents and ladies ie : reviewers - reviewee

    I have a friend still paying for having 142 reviews and all 1hr appointments
     

    " Tiffany Tees "
    Strangers are friends I have yet to meet.





  5. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to TiffanyTees For This Useful Post:

    mr maxi (20-11-10), sharkskin (20-11-10)

  6. #4
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Ten thousand miles away
    Posts
    951
    Reviews
    21

    Post

    Quote Originally Posted by TiffanyT View Post

    I for one was against this before, as I had a very degrading one that had been proven false and it came from an agency (same ips) which some folk believed I may add , and it took 3 years yes 3 to be taken off.
    I am sorry, and somewhat disturbed to hear that Tiffany.

    Leaving a ratted review up is one thing but leaving up words that are both ratted and degrading is another. Surely E-I could have edited the review.

    You can take a positive from it though.

    Having a negative review that was ratted because it came from an agency is a bit like having a "verified independent" badge on your profile.

  7. The Following User Says Thank You to sharkskin For This Useful Post:

    TiffanyTees (20-11-10)

  8. #5
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    5,856
    Blog Entries
    109

    Default

    Having a negative review that was ratted because it came from an agency is a bit like having a "verified independent" badge on your profile.

    TO TRUE SIR

    " Tiffany Tees "
    Strangers are friends I have yet to meet.





  9. The Following User Says Thank You to TiffanyTees For This Useful Post:

    sharkskin (21-11-10)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •