Results 1 to 5 of 5

Thread: Shouldn't both of this guys reviews have a rat on them ?

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    3,919
    Blog Entries
    1
    Reviews
    33

    Default Shouldn't both of this guys reviews have a rat on them ?


  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Dublin
    Posts
    1,199
    Reviews
    9

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by dave1dave View Post
    Bizarre - the style of English (if you could call it a style) is completely different in the two reviews.
    The Gods are just, and of our pleasant vices
    Make instruments to plague us

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Indoors with Emmasweet
    Posts
    36,636
    Blog Entries
    15
    Reviews
    61

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by dave1dave View Post
    just viewed ,strange alright,grammer very different in both.; doc;
    Between two evils, I always pick the one I never tried before.
    People who think they know everything are a great annoyance to those of us who do .: doc

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Mayo
    Posts
    45
    Reviews
    42

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by dave1dave View Post
    Yes, I agree. I don't understand when a reviewer has one review ratted, why all reviews (positive and negative) by that reviewer are not also ratted. They might as well be because there's not a snowball's chance in hell that anyone would trust the unratted reviews.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Between 2 arse cheeks
    Posts
    92
    Reviews
    76

    Default

    They have now.... (2 rats i mean)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •