Page 5 of 9 FirstFirst ... 34567 ... LastLast
Results 41 to 50 of 90

Thread: Ratted reviews

  1. #41
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Posts
    1,224
    Reviews
    33

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by lucy chambers View Post
    Now Maxi I don't think you are slow and nor do I think you really care about this issue- we both know what you think of reviews and we both know that you have stated it quite openly here before, at the time you handed in your badge. So with all due respect I am puzzled at your stance.

    If the escort is shown to be involved (through IP matching etc) in the placing of good reviews I believe the rats should remain.
    Good afternoon Miss Chambers.
    Believe it or not i do take the review system very seriously and would love to see it overhauled and yes i did hand back my badge because of the current state of it.
    What i want to see is a way of stopping any fake reviews being put on to the escorts record as this is only damaging to their reputation.

    "If the escort is shown to be involved (through IP matching etc) in the placing of bad reviews I believe the rats should remain".
    If the above is true should the escort not be banned. I believe they should. The same should go for any reviewer caught posting a fake review. Banned for good.

    I know it is a difficult scenario for the mods and i will await and respect any discision they make.

  2. #42
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Posts
    2,965
    Reviews
    6

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by mr maxi View Post
    Good afternoon Miss Chambers.
    Believe it or not i do take the review system very seriously and would love to see it overhauled and yes i did hand back my badge because of the current state of it.
    What i want to see is a way of stopping any fake reviews being put on to the escorts record as this is only damaging to their reputation.

    "If the escort is shown to be involved (through IP matching etc) in the placing of bad reviews I believe the rats should remain".
    If the above is true should the escort not be banned. I believe they should. The same should go for any reviewer caught posting a fake review. Banned for good.

    I know it is a difficult scenario for the mods and i will await and respect any discision they make.
    And she steps into the box and firmly closes the lid!!

  3. #43
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    21,994
    Reviews
    113

    Default

    Ratted reviews should stay up for 7 days to allow Escort or reviewer to come forward to fight a case for validity. If no approach is made ...delete them entirely. If a profile is seen to be a repeat offender ..delete/ban him/her too. End of story.
    Keeping rats on good reviews is as bad keeping them on bad. All rats should expire within a certain timeframe resulting in a decision by staff to either punish the escort or the author. If an escort is seen to be a repeat offender then her profile should be taken down.

    As I pointed out before, If I wanted to damage a girls profile, all I would have to do is keep changing my username keeping the same ip and continue to post reviews, knowing that each one will be ratted. Soon the escort in question will have numerous rats on her profile and I have achieved my goal...

  4. #44

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by mr maxi View Post
    Good afternoon Miss Chambers.

    "If the escort is shown to be involved (through IP matching etc) in the placing of bad reviews I believe the rats should remain".
    If the above is true should the escort not be banned. I believe they should. The same should go for any reviewer caught posting a fake review. Banned for good.

    I know it is a difficult scenario for the mods and i will await and respect any discision they make.
    Good afternoon Darling

    I agree on the banning of reviewers, but I cannot agree on the banning of escorts. Some make mistakes and a stiff warning, I think, is more appropriate than cutting of their livelihood, and most vitally, the access to the ugly mugs system.

    I do agree on the issue of rats ruining a profile.
    If life gives you lemons ask for Tequila

    Only sad bastards seek gratification from signatures

  5. #45

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by dannyboy10 View Post
    And she steps into the box and firmly closes the lid!!
    If I need a commentary I shall go to the greyhounds. Since we are discussing something that may have a direct effect on how we as escorts work, I would appreciate a little respect.
    If life gives you lemons ask for Tequila

    Only sad bastards seek gratification from signatures

  6. #46
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    2,552
    Reviews
    6

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by lucy chambers View Post
    If I need a commentary I shall go to the greyhounds. Since we are discussing something that may have a direct effect on how we as escorts work, I would appreciate a little respect.

    Now who is back in the box, Danny lol

  7. #47

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by lucy chambers View Post
    Are we still here?

    In my opinion- bad ratted reviews should be removed.n Good ratted reviews where there is good chance the escort is involved should remain. It is common sense, as unfortunately if they are pulled there is no deterrent.
    Good or bad its still fake. I see no point in keeping them in non of the cases.
    It is a mistery how some girls get deleted straight away a bad review without been ratted and some girls are left with the bad reviews,but ratted.

  8. #48

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by JAMESCORK View Post

    As I pointed out before, If I wanted to damage a girls profile, all I would have to do is keep changing my username keeping the same ip and continue to post reviews, knowing that each one will be ratted. Soon the escort in question will have numerous rats on her profile and I have achieved my goal...
    It would not be fair for the rats to expire, imo. When they did the report would remain. The report should be removed, or not.

    I think the scenario you mentioned is feasible but highly convoluted. Historically the way of this type of thing is a bad review- one would hope the mods are able to keep the rules for the type of thing you suggest may happen.
    Last edited by lucy chambers; 18-11-10 at 16:34.
    If life gives you lemons ask for Tequila

    Only sad bastards seek gratification from signatures

  9. #49

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by alexanda View Post
    Good or bad its still fake. I see no point in keeping them in non of the cases.
    It is a mistery how some girls get deleted straight away a bad review without been ratted and some girls are left with the bad reviews,but ratted.

    Alexanda-

    Please explain your link to the telephone number for eliza?
    Please explain your sudden interest in this matter?
    Please explain how you have this issue when I have seen you in chat many times?
    If life gives you lemons ask for Tequila

    Only sad bastards seek gratification from signatures

  10. #50
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    21,994
    Reviews
    113

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by lucy chambers View Post
    It would not be fair for the rats to expire, imo. When they did the report would remain. The report should be removed, or not.

    I think the scenario you mentioned is feasible but highly convoluted. Historically the way of this type of thing is a bad review- one would hope the mods are able to keep the rules for the type of thing you suggest may happen.
    Nope Honey...when the rats expire some action is taken and the review, rat and all is removed. I am assuming that removing rats incudes the attached review as well.

  11. The Following User Says Thank You to JAMESCORK For This Useful Post:

    Lucy Chambers (18-11-10)

Page 5 of 9 FirstFirst ... 34567 ... LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •