Life is not Black and White!!
Having the full picture is always better. It also lets you see patterns.
It is like the news and has to be factual. It is history.
If you really like an escort it allows you to weigh up the pros and cons.
when people get caught they learn and it is harder to catch them a second time.
I would have made a mistake only for the ratted reviews.
Keep them up, Please.
And well done to the moderators who do a great job!!
Established Member
Certified E-I Addict
Ratted reviews, no matter how we look at It, are damaging to an Escorts profile. Us guys here are supposingly more street wise than the average punter, (ooops sorry Dannyboy), client out there and can turn a blind eye to a plethora of twitching rats. But a novice could quite easily be confused or put off by a review profile with one or more rats simply because he may not fully understand what they mean. This is very topical right now as Diannasweet, with an unblemished profile of 26 positive reviews, now has to continue her career with 8 rats attached…for the rest of her career. Is this fair? Is this fair on any girl that has had to suffer a ratting?
What if it was I that would like to damage Dianna (and I’m am not....obviously...pfff...), all I would have to do is keep changing my username keeping the same ip and continue to post reviews for Dianna knowing that each one will be ratted. Soon she will have numerous rats on her previously unblemished profile. Now in Dianna case they were all good. What if they were all bad? Tell me this would not damage her career...
Ratted reviews should stay up for 7 days to allow Escort or reviewer to come forward to fight a case for validity. If no approach is made ...delete them entirely. If a profile is seen to be a repeat offender ..delete/ban him/her too. End of story.
If staff rat a review, they usually know if it is divilment on behalf of the reviewer or the Escort and should be in a position to take disciplinary action
Keeping Rats long term is silly, futile and damaging....
Last edited by JAMESCORK; 18-11-10 at 00:37.
Alyssa Jenkins (18-11-10), mr maxi (18-11-10)
Definitely it is unfair in Diana's case for the reasons you mention. And, it would make sense to get rid of them.
Originally Posted by JAMESCORK
If the reviewer is an obvoius fake then whats the point in me knowing something usefull about them. Delete them , simple.....
Point 2 , you may have a valid point which is why i like the next idea.
Some valid points made here and i especially like the 7 day rule. It gives everyone concerned a time scale to debate the issue.
I fully agree with deleting the profile whether it is client or escort submitting the false review.
I would like to ask the review moderators what they think of these points and if they would consider implimenting any of them.
Last edited by mr maxi; 18-11-10 at 12:12.
I agree with every word (except the punters bit).
Dianna was wronged on this Forum and I think some people owe a big apology!!
I await your responses....
I agree with every word (except the punters bit).
Dianna was wronged on this Forum and I think some people owe a big apology!!
I await your responses....
I assume you mean other escorts involved in this disagreement owe her an apology too.
I haven't said anything on this whole thing for one simple reason - it's none of my business. I don't see how it concerns you or alot of other posters who've felt the urge to write down their opinion. I'm not being critical but I doubt any or the majority of posters have the full facts.
Let the escorts involved and EI staff sort this out between themselves - it's their affair.
Yeah this is a Public forum but turning this whole thing into a popularity contest is counter productive and would only serve to confirm alexanda's point in that bloody justice thread.
alexanda (18-11-10)
I dont think that ratted positive reviews should be removed because as el said above, it tells you something about the reviewer and the escort but in most cases the escort.
El Gordo (18-11-10)
You know what they say about assumptions..so don't assume my assumings!
Is it not the affair of the clients when the review system to which we contribute is corupted? Why pray tell!!
Where is the popularity competition?
Your position on Alexandas Thread belies your true opinion is not that of neutral observer!
Thank you for your contribution!!
......but I have a big spoon and I think it can be of some benefit!!
You know what they say about assumptions..so don't assume my assumings!
Is it not the affair of the clients when the review system to which we contribute is corupted? Why pray tell!!
Where is the popularity competition?
Your position on Alexandas Thread belies your true opinion is not that of neutral observer!
Thank you for your contribution!!
......but I have a big spoon and I think it can be of some benefit!!
Not much of an assumption when dianna herself has expressed that she wishes for an apology from another escort now is it.
Reviews do concern clients, but not in this case as you no doubt know that it's been suggested by most that they were written by escorts.
Popularity competetion arises from people speaking up fr and against escorts without possessing the whole story.
Eh? i have no position on alexanda's thread, lol read what i said again. I didnt even post anything on that thread so not sure what you mean there by me not being neutral.
You're welcome.
I won't be writing anything else on this whole matter because again - it's NONE of my business! nor is it any of yours.
Lucy Chambers (18-11-10)
Some valid points made here and i especially like the 7 day rule. It gives everyone concerned a time scale to debate the issue.
I fully agree with deleting the profile whether it is client or escort submitting the false review.
I would like to ask the review moderators what they think of these points and if they would consider implimenting any of them.[/QUOTE]
Please save your bickering for another thread as it is of no value to this one.
Moderators i await your thoughts as previously requested and i will not go away.
Thankyou.
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote