Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 49

Thread: EI very Clannish

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    8,431
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    I'd say he's talking about the thread Forrest put up about the Jessica James review and the way people accused him of putting it up for a variety of reasons, or putting it up on someones bahalf.........

    A right load of bollox the whole thing was, I didn't even bother me arse to post on it...........
    "It's far easier to fight for principles than to live up to them."
    L

  2. The Following User Says Thank You to luther For This Useful Post:

    hd7055 (01-11-10)

  3. #2
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    8,242
    Reviews
    10

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by luther View Post
    I'd say he's talking about the thread Forrest put up about the Jessica James review and the way people accused him of putting it up for a variety of reasons, or putting it up on someones bahalf.........A right load of bollox the whole thing was, I didn't even bother me arse to post on it...........
    LINK, Luther, for fucksake.

  4. #3
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Posts
    1,300
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Well, sometimes it may seem that way about the clannish stuff.

    I have noticed how some people are interacting very well with everybody and are very kind to give a thank you to posters that deserved it somehow. On the other hand, some other people seem to be tick enough and would only interact with men users or with escorts that they may like best. In a few cases, I cared enough to give my opinion and my thanks to certain posters, which acknowledged all replies but mine … for some very strange reasons.

    I kept repeating in the past that interacting with an escort here or accepting / rejecting her point of view doesn't mean you have to pay her a visit. On the forums, we should be all first of all users and only then escorts, clients etc ...

    To be honest, I am happy that I am capable not to care too much about the attitude of the last category of people I described. But I don't like to be seen as nobody's fool either by being too giving to people who wouldn’t give me the time of the day, so I have probably become partially one of them ... only replying to people I know and I like, ignoring everything else

  5. The Following 10 Users Say Thank You to Sensual Delights For This Useful Post:

    69patrick69 (02-11-10), An don (01-11-10), ChiefHandker (01-11-10), Experienced Punter esq (01-11-10), hd7055 (01-11-10), JohnRambo (01-11-10), Lucy Chambers (01-11-10), luther (01-11-10), scotus (01-11-10), westcorklad (01-11-10)

  6. #4
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    1,205
    Reviews
    36

    Default

    How can you not love the interwebhighway? Have modem, will blog. I always make sure I have my flame-retardant underwear on before I launch.
    Though we are not now that strength which in old days moved earth and heaven; that which we are, we are; one equal temper of heroic hearts, made weak by time and fate, but strong in will to strive, to seek, to find, and not to yield.

  7. The Following User Says Thank You to BruceAlmighty For This Useful Post:

    Lucy Chambers (01-11-10)

  8. #5
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    2,101

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by luther View Post
    I'd say he's talking about the thread Forrest put up about the Jessica James review and the way people accused him of putting it up for a variety of reasons, or putting it up on someones bahalf.........

    A right load of bollox the whole thing was, I didn't even bother me arse to post on it...........
    thats an example alrite I steer clear from such threads it serves /served nothing I was genuinely saddened to see a decent individual in Forrest attacked ya attacked & accused of having ulterior motives for posting that thread...

  9. The Following User Says Thank You to Experienced Punter esq For This Useful Post:

    Forrest (02-11-10)

  10. #6
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Posts
    916
    Reviews
    4

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by luther View Post
    I'd say he's talking about the thread Forrest put up about the Jessica James review and the way people accused him of putting it up for a variety of reasons, or putting it up on someones bahalf.........

    A right load of bollox the whole thing was, I didn't even bother me arse to post on it...........
    I've been reading the boards for a little while now and I have to say I agree with Experienced Punter but it wasn't just in one thread. Being new I have no loyalties to anyone and I tend to avoid the more contentious threads. I have noticed though that there's often a tendency to agree and back up the people you like on whatever particular issue it is, so to me, it is quite clique-ish. This also seems to include people joining into the more bitter debates simply to back their mate up when it really doesn't concern them so in that sense it quite reminds me of a primary school fight where the whole bloody school has to gather around egg on and join in. And yes, the irony of saying this and then posting this where really it is none of my concern isn't lost on me.
    Just an impartial observation.

  11. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to ChiefHandker For This Useful Post:

    Experienced Punter esq (01-11-10), luther (01-11-10)

  12. #7
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    8,431
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ChiefHandker View Post
    I've been reading the boards for a little while now and I have to say I agree with Experienced Punter but it wasn't just in one thread. Being new I have no loyalties to anyone and I tend to avoid the more contentious threads. I have noticed though that there's often a tendency to agree and back up the people you like on whatever particular issue it is, so to me, it is quite clique-ish. This also seems to include people joining into the more bitter debates simply to back their mate up when it really doesn't concern them so in that sense it quite reminds me of a primary school fight where the whole bloody school has to gather around egg on and join in. And yes, the irony of saying this and then posting this where really it is none of my concern isn't lost on me.
    Just an impartial observation.
    What kind of jibberish is this eh???

    Just say you agree with something and stick with it and no more of the nonsence..........

    BTW, you can't be in my gang, your avater disturbs me because it's either Rover in drag or there may be a high risk that it may arouse someome.........






    I've noticed your posts, they're good..............
    "It's far easier to fight for principles than to live up to them."
    L

  13. The Following User Says Thank You to luther For This Useful Post:

    ChiefHandker (01-11-10)

  14. #8

    Default

    Oh balls. I personally think I have a mind my own- if someone agrees great, if not equally great. If I agree with something I will say so- and if I don't agree, I will say so. We aren't in the schoolroom now.
    If life gives you lemons ask for Tequila

    Only sad bastards seek gratification from signatures

  15. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Lucy Chambers For This Useful Post:

    69patrick69 (02-11-10), hd7055 (01-11-10), JohnRambo (01-11-10), scotus (01-11-10)

  16. #9
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Posts
    2,965
    Reviews
    6

    Default

    Beatings will continue until morale improves!

  17. #10
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Posts
    8,638
    Blog Entries
    11

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by luther View Post
    A right load of bollox the whole thing was, I didn't even bother me arse to post on it...........
    If we were like a tribe, Luther's Red Indian name would have to be "O Wise One" :-)

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •