Not allowing explicit reviews.

[Shirley Joy]

I think Shirleyy is right and there are many ways to get your point across without being explicit. Personally, I do not lik explicit reviews whether they are good or bad.

yep..that's right..all u need <reaper12> it's a bit of elegance writing about imtimate act that includes your own person..

[Rodney69]

I know it's an adult oriented site, but Escorts are human beings too with family, friends, brothers, sisters etc. Not pieces of meat. If they choose not to allow explicit details then their choice should be respected. Personally I don't think you need explicit details to make an informed choice. For the most part you can tell if an Escort is for you by the general trend of their reviews, not just one exceptional review or one negative one.

[Shirley Joy]

I know it's an adult oriented site, but Escorts are human beings too with family, friends, brothers, sisters etc. Not pieces of meat. If they choose not to allow explicit details then their choice should be respected. Personally I don't think you need explicit details to make an informed choice. For the most part you can tell if an Escort is for you by the general trend of their reviews, not just one exceptional review or one negative one.

that's my point!!! that's soo right sayed!!!

[reaper12]

I know it's an adult oriented site, but Escorts are human beings too with family, friends, brothers, sisters etc. Not pieces of meat. If they choose not to allow explicit details then their choice should be respected. Personally I don't think you need explicit details to make an informed choice. For the most part you can tell if an Escort is for you by the general trend of their reviews, not just one exceptional review or one negative one.

lol, what? when did I say they were pieces of meat? I am not condoning been rude or treating the escorts badly or been disrespectful. I am talking about the fact that I am paying for a service and I am been told how I should write my review on that service. The services the escort provides are listed in her profile yet I can't use those terms when I am reviewing an escort. Instead I have to try and find a fancy way of saying the same thing.

And again, I am not talking about writing explicit reviews, detailing every single thing done. But I think even if an escort does not allow explicit reviews, the client should be allowed put in the favorites he has received, if he wants to. There is nothing explicit in this, it's just listing what the escort has already put down in her profile. For me it offers reassurance that the escort does do the favorites she has listed, also if she has extra services then you can see that as well.

Anyway, sorry if all this makes me sound like a bastard. I am not, but, just Rodney's post implied that I think escorts are pieces or meat, so I wanted to respond.

[Shirley Joy]

lol, what? when did I say they were pieces of meat? I am not condoning been rude or treating the escorts badly or been disrespectful. I am talking about the fact that I am paying for a service and I am been told how I should write my review on that service. The services the escort provides are listed in her profile yet I can't use those terms when I am reviewing an escort. Instead I have to try and find a fancy way of saying the same thing.

And again, I am not talking about writing explicit reviews, detailing every single thing done. But I think even if an escort does not allow explicit reviews, the client should be allowed put in the favorites he has received, if he wants to. There is nothing explicit in this, it's just listing what the escort has already put down in her profile. For me it offers reassurance that the escort does do the favorites she has listed, also if she has extra services then you can see that as well.

Anyway, sorry if all this makes me sound like a bastard. I am not, but, just Rodney's post implied that I think escorts are pieces or meat, so I wanted to respond.

but if <escort ireland> would not have this reviews section (as many other escorts websites), where would u put your "explicit good/bad experience" ????
most of the websites doesn't have a field report section,and ppl still trust and don't request info about anterior experience of someother punter with a particullary escort..

[Rodney69]

lol, what? when did I say they were pieces of meat? I am not condoning been rude or treating the escorts badly or been disrespectful. I am talking about the fact that I am paying for a service and I am been told how I should write my review on that service. The services the escort provides are listed in her profile yet I can't use those terms when I am reviewing an escort. Instead I have to try and find a fancy way of saying the same thing.

And again, I am not talking about writing explicit reviews, detailing every single thing done. But I think even if an escort does not allow explicit reviews, the client should be allowed put in the favorites he has received, if he wants to. There is nothing explicit in this, it's just listing what the escort has already put down in her profile. For me it offers reassurance that the escort does do the favorites she has listed, also if she has extra services then you can see that as well.

Anyway, sorry if all this makes me sound like a bastard. I am not, but, just Rodney's post implied that I think escorts are pieces or meat, so I wanted to respond.

Hi Reaper12, Apologies if my comments came across as being directed at you. That was not my intention at all. They are just my opinion and not directed at anyone, but I can see how you would think that. Sorry about that.

I generally don't use explicit detail, but in one case I too had a review censored, at the time I believed I was using terms that the escort herself used when advertising on this forum, so thought it would be OK, but I respect the decision of the moderators and escort for it to be removed.

[Monkeynut]

I would think that the more explicit and lewd the review is says more about the de-generate that wrote it than the escort. I stopped ticking the boxes while writing reviews some time ago as I feel its unnecessary. I agree with the escorts sentiments that posted on this thread.

[sharkskin]

Personally, I am surprised that so many escorts allow explicit reviews. (No criticism to those that do.)

I guess that many punters think that the reviews are like reviews of a car in a motoring mag or perhaps like those of random products on the amazon site.

Escort reviews are not like that. They are reviews of real people. Do you get performance reviews or assessments in your job? It's hard to be on the receiving end of one of those even if it turns out to be a good one. Reviews of escorts are like that only harder.

At work, you might get a review once or twice a year. The review stays private between you and your boss. How would you feel if the review was posted on the internet for the whole world to see forever? How about if you got a review once or twice a week?

That is what we expect escorts to put up with when they allow us to review them.

[reaper12]

Hi Reaper12, Apologies if my comments came across as being directed at you. That was not my intention at all. They are just my opinion and not directed at anyone, but I can see how you would think that. Sorry about that.

I generally don't use explicit detail, but in one case I too had a review censored, at the time I believed I was using terms that the escort herself used when advertising on this forum, so thought it would be OK, but I respect the decision of the moderators and escort for it to be removed.

It's ok, thanks for the response!!

[fiatpunter]

Personally, I am surprised that so many escorts allow explicit reviews. (No criticism to those that do.)

I guess that many punters think that the reviews are like reviews of a car in a motoring mag or perhaps like those of random products on the amazon site.

Escort reviews are not like that. They are reviews of real people. Do you get performance reviews or assessments in your job? It's hard to be on the receiving end of one of those even if it turns out to be a good one. Reviews of escorts are like that only harder.

At work, you might get a review once or twice a year. The review stays private between you and your boss. How would you feel if the review was posted on the internet for the whole world to see forever? How about if you got a review once or twice a week?

That is what we expect escorts to put up with when they allow us to review them.

here you have the problem with the line between a personal service and a business service both of which escorting is.

I don't think the comparison with an employment review is valid as it is usually discussed with the people to whom it is relevant.

There is plenty of scope for giving a useful positive/negative review without writing a reader's letter though I feel that services provided should be listed. It is probably not necessary to tick thsoe availed of but at the end of the day we are here for one thing...well maybe a few things...