Jessica James

[JohnRambo]

I was just looking at the home page and noticed Jessica James profile.
I had the pleasure of meeting Jessica several times during 2007 & 2008, and was very surprised when I had a look at her recent reviews, and saw the very negative one from Dub1.

I can understand that sometimes escort & client don't 'click' and we can all have an off day, but to say she is bossy, nervous, sarcastic etc is completely the opposite of what I felt when I met Jessica. During our first meeting, she was so friendly and easy going, constantly paying me compliments - she may have been saying it just to make me feel good, but it sounded sincere and it worked, as my head(both of them) certainly swelled.

I would say that I met Jessica on about 6 subsequent occasions and I wouldn't have done that if she was anything like Dub1's description.

I'm no oil painting and I'm not the fittest of blokes, but I have respect for the ladies that allow me to get down and dirty with them. I have only had one or two encounters where I came out saying I wouldn't consider meeting the lady again, and that was probably more to do with me than them.

I'm not disputing all that Dub1 says, but the picture he painted of Jessica is completely alien to my impressions of her.

Jessica does seem to have quite a chequered reviews history, I do not feel it was right Dub1 felt pressured into removing his review, if that’s how he felt the review went then so be it and Jessica also got to say her version of what happened, it should have been left at that, how anyone else got on during their appointment with Jessica is their business and should not have been used here to pressure Dub1 or anyone else who might have had a different experience with an escort that they did, I hope this does not happen again.

[Brunette Tess]

I'd like to say that I did not put Forrest 'up to it'. He started this thread completely of his own accord, nor do I even keep in contact with him. We're both busy, aren't we darling?
However, if mods want to remove the thread or some people are getting their back up at another girl getting complimented - then be my guest. I couldn't care less. I couldn't less about the review being moved either - I said what I had to say and I meant every word.

[monster_monster]

She stood up for herself in the review and she did a pretty good job of it despite losing her cool a bit.. Is that not enough?

yeah JJ said what she wanted to say and there is no need to comment on that at all as it has nothing to do with what i was speaking about. All I did was agree with Forrest for showing there was precedent for his original post in this thread by providing the following links:
1: Lucy Chambers review
2: I expect an answer
3: a disgrace

As you can see he has done nothing that hasn't been done here before but for some reason people take a pop at him and i was wondering if it's because JJ doesn't spend a lot of time on this forum so she wouldn't have built up the same relationship with posters as if she was posting loads

[debest]

yeah JJ said what she wanted to say and there is no need to comment on that at all as it has nothing to do with what i was speaking about. All I did was agree with Forrest for showing there was precedent for his original post in this thread by providing the following links:
1: Lucy Chambers review
2: I expect an answer
3: a disgrace

As you can see he has done nothing that hasn't been done here before but for some reason people take a pop at him and i was wondering if it's because JJ doesn't spend a lot of time on this forum so she wouldn't have built up the same relationship with posters as if she was posting loads

You might be right about Lucy getting treated differently than JJ by some posters. I personally never said it set a precedent. It has probably happened a few times before knowing this place. But I think forrest didn't give good example. The 2 reviews don't compare, one was sharing his experiance of an escort with other punters (which was very different to mine) and the other....well I'm not sure what it was.

I'd like to add, I've seen Jessica catch some unfair slack on these boards before and some of it was nasty. So maybe she does deserves to catch a break on here.

[An don]

yeah JJ said what she wanted to say and there is no need to comment on that at all as it has nothing to do with what i was speaking about. All I did was agree with Forrest for showing there was precedent for his original post in this thread by providing the following links:
1: Lucy Chambers review
2: I expect an answer
3: a disgrace

As you can see he has done nothing that hasn't been done here before but for some reason people take a pop at him and i was wondering if it's because JJ doesn't spend a lot of time on this forum so she wouldn't have built up the same relationship with posters as if she was posting loads

Look at the links again and the review of Ms Chambers was never removed and is still there. So the precedent isnt that the thread was started about the review , the precedent is the fact that the review was removed because of the thread. And to be honest the reviewer must have checked his balls at the door because as far as i remember he said in review that he stands over it but yet he still asks for it to be deleted .

[Lucy Chambers]

Interesting. I shall not comment further, as it seems that this is personal to some people.

If you read the threads listed, you will see I also asked for the review of me to be reinstated. I commented on hwat I thought about the review process on NA reviews, and I was in the wrong, everyone is entitled to their own opinion.

Forrest, apologies if I somehow offended you. Refer to above comments.

[monster_monster]

Look at the links again and the review of Ms Chambers was never removed and is still there. So the precedent isnt that the thread was started about the review , the precedent is the fact that the review was removed because of the thread. And to be honest the reviewer must have checked his balls at the door because as far as i remember he said in review that he stands over it but yet he still asks for it to be deleted .

in fairness An Don I'm not interested in the actual review of Lucy, I only referenced these links as they were the ones supplied by Forrest here, and from them we can see that an escort who got a non-positive review was stood up for by posters on this site. This is the precedent that Forrest seemed to use as justification for starting this thread and opening someone else's review up for discussion.

as for the review of Lucy, although i don't agree with it unfortunately we are in a situation where it is accepted within the E-I rules so all the escorts will have to put up with reviews like that be they fair or not.

regarding Jessica's review, I did not get the chance to read it but do agree with you in what you say about the reviewer checking his balls at the door. If you write something in the way of a review or post on the thread you should only ever contemplate having it removed if it's 1 insulting or 2 a lie. If the reviewer states that he stands by his review then this is stating that it's the truth so why would you ever ask for it to be removed

finally i'd just like to end by saying, there are three sides to every story, your side, her side and then the truth. we shouldn't be so quick at having a pop at someone unless we were actually there to see what really happened and not just heard two biased sides of the same story.

[dub1]

Just to put the record straight I was not asked by Jesse or anyone else to remove my review. As for being pressured into removing my review that is just nonsense. I should have asked for the review to be taken down ages ago but through sheer pig headiness on my behalf I didn't. On the day of the appointment in question I was not in the best of form and hence the appointment didn't go well,. it was entirely my fault and I am sure if I had met Jesse on a different day the appointment would have gone great and it would have been reflected in my review. I hope this matter can be laid to rest now.

[Brunette Tess]

Thanks for setting that straight, Dub1. I also think this thread should be locked now. Forrest said what he wanted to say in his post (Yes, he was entitled to his opinion). I responded because the thread was about me, and so did Dub1.
So, let's move on, shall we?

Jess xxx

[Westsidex]

I'd like to say that I did not put Forrest 'up to it'. He started this thread completely of his own accord, nor do I even keep in contact with him.

I wouldnt believe for a second that you put him up to it. He isnt like that at all and speaks of his own fee will. Im 100% sure of this. To suggest otherwise is rubbish.

Westside.