Results 1 to 10 of 19

Thread: Forum rules

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by vampirejackie View Post
    Jackie, with the greatest of respect that rule applies to your own threads, doesn't it? John is new here....
    If life gives you lemons ask for Tequila

    Only sad bastards seek gratification from signatures

  2. The Following User Says Thank You to Lucy Chambers For This Useful Post:

    johnmurphy (24-10-10)

  3. #2
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    507

    Default

    Bumping Posts
    Don't keep replying to your own posts purely to keep your thread on top.

    this is all i can find in the rules about bumping and i do not see how i broke that rule

  4. #3
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    16,039
    Blog Entries
    11

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by johnmurphy View Post
    Bumping Posts
    Don't keep replying to your own posts purely to keep your thread on top.

    this is all i can find in the rules about bumping and i do not see how i broke that rule
    Johnny? And no need to thank me here but technically, not saying you should be banned, but technically you could have being the moment you asked for the rules because when you register ,you click on a wee box thats says you agree to the site rules and since you didnt even know where they were. You get my drift.

    just saying,
    Westside.
    Last edited by Westsidex; 24-10-10 at 15:50.

  5. #4
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    16,753
    Reviews
    57

    Default

    I do agree John, that rule is outdated, it was originally intended to stop ladies bumping their own ad threads in order to keep them on top, it doesn't say anything about another poster bumping them. Since then we have had additional rules applied to the ladies where they can only place one ad per day, which was intended to level the playing field and stop the bumping act. Also posters are unable to reply to these threads so that favouritism couldn't be shown either, honestly, do you think one of Lucy's ad's would ever fall from the first page if it was allowed

  6. The Following User Says Thank You to anon361 For This Useful Post:

    johnmurphy (24-10-10)

  7. #5
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    507

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Westsidex View Post
    Johnny? And no need to thank me here but technically, not saying you should be banned, but technically you could have being the moment you asked for the rules because when you register ,you click on a wee box thats says you agree to the site rules and since you didnt even know where they were. You get my drift.

    just saying,
    Westside.
    westecle I read the rules at the time of registration but as i was not registering today i needed to find the rules again because it would appear that a new unknown rule had been introduced in the meantime that however not being the case i can not see how any rule was broken by me you may thank me if you wish tubby

  8. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to johnmurphy For This Useful Post:

    An don (24-10-10), Lucy Chambers (24-10-10)

  9. #6

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by johnmurphy View Post
    westecle I read the rules at the time of registration but as i was not registering today i needed to find the rules again because it would appear that a new unknown rule had been introduced in the meantime that however not being the case i can not see how any rule was broken by me you may thank me if you wish tubby
    You didn't break the rule, as such.
    If life gives you lemons ask for Tequila

    Only sad bastards seek gratification from signatures

  10. The Following User Says Thank You to Lucy Chambers For This Useful Post:

    johnmurphy (24-10-10)

  11. #7
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    507

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by lucy chambers View Post
    You didn't break the rule, as such.
    from what i can see there was no rule broken and no need for the as such qualifier

  12. #8

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by johnmurphy View Post
    from what i can see there was no rule broken and no need for the as such qualifier
    Oooh, I love it when you get irritated. You could say that you broke the rule of provoking other members. Hence the 'as such'. Mwah.
    If life gives you lemons ask for Tequila

    Only sad bastards seek gratification from signatures

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •