Fake Photos - Some Leniency?

[Patricia]

At the moment the rules for fake photo reports state that "Approved Fake Photo Reports are published on the escort's profile for 3 months, after which time they will expire and no longer show. If staff are sure an escort is using fake photos, they will press a button which will remove the photos and will also prevent the escort uploading any new photos for a period of 30 days. If staff are not sure if the photos are fake or not, they will not do this".

About this banning for 30 days if we are sure the lady used fake photos. It was brought in for a good reason, that some ladies just kept putting fake photos up again and again, and we needed to do something to stop this.

However it has occurred to me that some ladies found using fake photos may simply be new and inexperienced and have made a judgement mistake in not using real photos, but are not actually 'bad' escorts so to speak. I think we should be trying to get these ladies using real photos above all else. Yes we must punish those who use fake photos to discourage the practice, but we don't want to be overly harsh as what we really want is to get them to realise the error of their ways and use real photos, not drive them away and all they'll probably do is start a new ID here.

What I'd like to propose is: If a lady is found using fake photos and given the 30 day ban, at Ad Staff discretion, if she provides genuine photos and we are 100% they are genuine, waive the ban and put her real photos up. The fake photo report would still remain on her profile for 3 months, but we'd have shown leniency in not enforcing the 30 day photo ban, in recognition of the fact that we are now sure she is using real photos. This wouldn't help the escorts who want to keep using fake photos, as they wouldn't be providing real photos, but it would help escorts who are genuinely sorry and want to change their ways and start using real photos.

I think we have to remember being an escort can be expensive, the rent, the advertising, the photos etc, and is it in anybody's interest for us to be too harsh on escorts here, if they are prepared to see the error of their ways and use real photos?

So, I'd like to propose that 30 day ban can be waived at Ad Staff discretion IF and ONLY IF Ad Staff are sure the new photos the lady is providing are genuine.

I'll add a poll to get some feedback.

Thanks

Pat x

[Iashaf]

I am in favour of all of the above.......... as long as EI have been paid.
Once said funds have been received. Game on.

[dr love]

as iahaf said agree with all proposed anything to get rid of fakes good for punters and genuine escorts.

[anon361]

PS. I voted no because you don't have the option I would agree with, ban stays in place on her being able to upload pictures but Ad staff is allowed publish authenticated genuine ones for her.

[Westsidex]

It should be waived under these circumstances. What punters want at the end of the day is genuine real photos and if ad staff are happy that a woman under a ban has provided 100% genuine photos then i cant see the harm in waiving the ban.

Sincerely,
Westside.

[anon361]

I think the ban on her being able to upload her own photos should stay in place but if she submits genuine photos then fine, let ad staff publish them.
We all have seen it before where a girl submits genuine pictures but once she sees it's outside office hours up go the fake ones and by morning she reloads the genuine ones..

[Patricia]

The trouble with you two - Lucy and Anon - is you are very smart and great ideas, but our poor nerds are already worked to death without us giving them more complicated software changes to impliment!

[Lucy Chambers]

The trouble with you two - Lucy and Anon - is you are very smart and great ideas, but our poor nerds are already worked to death without us giving them more complicated software changes to impliment!

Sorry Pat. The new site upgrade is fab.

[corkpunter]

The trouble with you two - Lucy and Anon - is you are very smart and great ideas, but our poor nerds are already worked to death without us giving them more complicated software changes to impliment!

Just out of curiosity, how much time does AD Staff use on all this? Tine Eye has an api that could be implemented to do this check automatically and it wouldn't be a problem in the first place. According to Tine eye, the pricing is 1500 USD for 30.000 searches. https://api.tineye.com/pricing. However ofcourse this again requires your IT guys to implement this.

[Patricia]

Just out of curiosity, how much time does AD Staff use on all this? Tine Eye has an api that could be implemented to do this check automatically and it wouldn't be a problem in the first place. According to Tine eye, the pricing is 1500 USD for 30.000 searches. https://api.tineye.com/pricing. However ofcourse this again requires your IT guys to implement this.

Thanks, I'll have to look again at that. I wasn't paying much attention to TinyEye as I never seem to get much results from it when I go looking, but if it is improved, worth me looking again.