Established Member
Certified E-I Addict
I think you could be right anon,one of his reviews is quite similar to a few of the person i assume you are talking about...esp the n/a reviewOriginally Posted by anon361
Can I ask a question, it seems to me that this guy knows his way around reviewing an escort and as per the one review I read he was not afraid to turn on his heels, sounds very similar to another prolific reviewer we know, any relation??
Ps, that has stopped reviewing
I have lived a life of regrets.
Established Member
Certified E-I Addict
It could be, he is a regualar visitor to ladies, he writes reviews on all his encounters and keeps notes on them I would imagine, how else could he remember them all which is the same as MrF. He only starts writting reviews on dates that happened after MrF's last review date and the only lady he reviewed that Mr F also reviewed coincidently is the only lady he said he met before. He is also as arrogant as Mr Fussy the way he reviewed Anna, and even says he can be FUSSY...I think you could be right anon,one of his reviews is quite similar to a few of the person i assume you are talking about...esp the n/a review
Last edited by anon361; 22-10-10 at 07:04.
Weren't you complaining a while ago about MrFussy trying to increase his review count? Now you're saying that he posted 12 reviews from another account, rather than increasing his own total to 142? Why would he do that?
“I wish you wouldn’t keep appearing and vanishing so suddenly; you make one quite giddy!”
“All right,” said the Cat; and this time it vanished quite slowly, beginning with the end of the tail, and ending with the grin, which remained some time after the rest of it had gone.
Established Member
Certified E-I Addict
No, I was saying his last review was BS, besides, I'm no saying anything, I'm merely hypothesising...
Why not put a time limit of say three days in which you can post a review. The reviews is a great tool for clients but can be abused which is not fair on escort or client. The rule should be, if in doubt rat it. I would rather see a top lady with 5 completely trust worthy reviews than sixty dodgy ones.
Archived User
Certified E-I Addict
That's a bit harsh Kelly, considering you know that I've had to rat quite a few.SHHHHH dont tell any one E-I are scared of ratting reviews now that are odvesely fake
Established Member
Certified E-I Addict
Were not scared to rat reviews. Why would we be scared now as we've been ratting reviews all along. We can't just rat reviews because people may think their fake. There has to be proof that their fake. As Sam said we done alot of checks on these reviews.SHHHHH dont tell any one E-I are scared of ratting reviews now that are odvesely fake
Help Keyla in her fight with cancer. Every little helps.
It could happen to any of us.
https://gofund.me/8e340537
The burden of proof should be to prove the review is genuine if it is challenged. At the end of the day a bad review can impinge on a persons ability to earn a living and although I believe the moderators do an excellent to the best of their ability within the set out perimeters, perhaps we should raise the bar where quality beats quantity every time.
I believe that would be of more benefit to escort and client.
Sorry just my two cents.
Last edited by dannyboy10; 22-10-10 at 09:51.
Archived User
Certified E-I Addict
The point is, we have been through this process already.
Not trying to get your back up I was merely floating the idea of a time limit between appointment and review. While it is possible for a client to keep notes on an escort and review her weeks later with a number of other ladies I do not believe it to be fair. The reason I believe this is that the escort will certainly and one would hope not be keeping notes on clients and therefore it is unreasonable to expect her to remember the appointment and therefore diminishes her opportunity to counter a bad review.
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
