Radical feminists’ objection to sex work is un-feminist,The tyranny of the cock

[johnwin530]

https://theconversation.com/radical-...feminist-81333

[SteveB]

My worth isn’t determined by how much sex I’ve had. Good quote, I think.

[Lara Mills]

Brilliant article, thanks for sharing. My two favourite parts are here:

If feminists aren’t fighting for my right to use my body how I choose, then they’ve dramatically detoured from their mission.

Sex work isn’t an industry you have to love, nor is it an industry you have to find empowering. But love and empowerment aren’t things we ever expect of any other industry either. The sex industry doesn’t need your admiration, but nor does it deserve your condemnation.

If there is anything feminists should be in agreement on, it’s our right to make our own decisions about how we use our bodies.

[Mr Sweet Guy]

https://theconversation.com/radical-...feminist-81333

A very interesting good article you posted up John

But Ray Cowel comments on this article especially his first and 2nd comment, make points about the industry.

One of his comment say lot about clients who I can understand what Ray mean. When clients go to meet Ladies and just want company, to which it not all about sex.

Some very interesting comment about this article , but not going to read all 439 comment

[Floki]

Brilliant article, thanks for sharing. My two favourite parts are here:

If feminists aren’t fighting for my right to use my body how I choose, then they’ve dramatically detoured from their mission.

This is only contradicting themselves.

They are basically saying,
"We are fighting for women's rights, but no, they can't have sex for money because we don't like it."

Then this is not fighting for women's right, this is controlling women's rights, controlling what they can do.

[Lara Mills]

This is only contradicting themselves.

They are basically saying,
"We are fighting for women's rights, but no, they can't have sex for money because we don't like it."

Then this is not fighting for women's right, this is controlling women's rights, controlling what they can do.

Exactly! I saw something on Twitter or Tumblr a while back which I can't find any more, but it basically said the following:

Rad Fem: Women should be free to do whatever jobs they want to do.
Sex Worker: I want to do sex work.
Rad Fem: No, not that!

They don't want anything that might disagree with their ideals and perceptions

[Meursault]

This is only contradicting themselves.

They are basically saying,
"We are fighting for women's rights, but no, they can't have sex for money because we don't like it."

Then this is not fighting for women's right, this is controlling women's rights, controlling what they can do.

That is one contradiction. We fought for women to have the right to an abortion, yet we say they cannot choose who to have sex with.

Another contradiction i see is that anti-prostitution campaigners come out and say they want to ban prostitution to protect women. even though they never say ban marriage despite the fact that there is more violence in it. I am not saying they should either. I just think it is hypocrisy to assert you have womens welfare at the core of your heart, and say you want prostitution and pornography banned but not relationships.

[ladiesman217]

This is only contradicting themselves.

They are basically saying,
"We are fighting for women's rights, but no, they can't have sex for money because we don't like it."

Then this is not fighting for women's right, this is controlling women's rights, controlling what they can do.

And that is the exact definition of feminazi.

Feminist: 1000x YES.
Feminazi: burn in hell the lot of you ---> because you're not part of the solution, you're part of the problem!