the wedding will be great the best man will be the grooms uncle and the brides father...the bridesmaids will also be the grooms mother and sister and the brides auntie..leaving the priest to fiddle with the ..band ffs ppl keep it clean ....incest is best all the same as they say in cork.
“I wish you wouldn’t keep appearing and vanishing so suddenly; you make one quite giddy!”
“All right,” said the Cat; and this time it vanished quite slowly, beginning with the end of the tail, and ending with the grin, which remained some time after the rest of it had gone.
Lucy Chambers (14-09-10)
anyway whats the big deal sure the parents of these were brother and sister and they look normal..
the sister is a bit rough ill grant you
"The tragedy of our day is the climate of fear in which we live and fear breeds repression."
They say in some households, or so I'm told:
"Why go across the street when you can just go across the hall?"
But then on the serious side of things, I find that perhaps the most interesting thing in the article is the fact that the father in this case, who'd had a brief relationship with 'James' mother, was denied the possibility of finding out/proving that 'James' was his son, way back when he was only 4 years old. The article said that the mother had put the guy she'd started seeing right after that as the father of 'James' on the Birth Cert, but I find it odd that the real father's claim to determine if he was or wasn't the real father was blocked/denied by the court.
It seems to me that, if there is ANY doubt one way or the other, that a DNA/paternity test should certainly be allowed, as making the determination as to what is the truth, either way it might go, is the primary obligation of the legal system. If that test had been allowed, and 'James' had been raised knowing his half-sister, this whole situation would never have happened in the first place.
Last edited by Cable87; 14-09-10 at 17:20.
Lucy Chambers (14-09-10)