Results 1 to 5 of 5

Thread: Review policy, a request for clarification

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Ten thousand miles away
    Posts
    951
    Reviews
    21

    Default Review policy, a request for clarification

    It used to be quite common to see reviews posted with a note to the effect that the time and date were approximate.

    There is a note in the review rules to the effect that you cannot use this to get around the restriction on reviews of meetings that took place more than three months before the date of submission.

    Then, the mods started to reject reviews which stated that the time was approximate even if the review was of a recent meeting.

    Now I note reviews appearing with approximate times once again.

    May I ask for a clarification of the actual policy on this matter?

    Thanks.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Posts
    5,354

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by sharkskin View Post
    It used to be quite common to see reviews posted with a note to the effect that the time and date were approximate.

    There is a note in the review rules to the effect that you cannot use this to get around the restriction on reviews of meetings that took place more than three months before the date of submission.

    Then, the mods started to reject reviews which stated that the time was approximate even if the review was of a recent meeting.

    Now I note reviews appearing with approximate times once again.

    May I ask for a clarification of the actual policy on this matter?

    Thanks.
    Thanks Sharskin for your comments, I will get back to you on this, and check it out.

  3. The Following User Says Thank You to vampirejackie For This Useful Post:

    sharkskin (12-09-10)

  4. #3
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    In a cathouse
    Posts
    3,548
    Blog Entries
    1
    Reviews
    26

    Default

    Reviews without a precise time and date should not be allowed. When they're negative the escort doesn't have a proper chance to reply, since she (or he) doesn't know which appointment, if any, is being described. So negative reviews without a proper date and time should not be allowed. But it would be unfair to post only positive reviews, so none of them should be allowed.

    “I wish you wouldn’t keep appearing and vanishing so suddenly; you make one quite giddy!”
    “All right,” said the Cat; and this time it vanished quite slowly, beginning with the end of the tail, and ending with the grin, which remained some time after the rest of it had gone.

  5. The Following User Says Thank You to El Gordo For This Useful Post:

    Iashaf (12-09-10)

  6. #4
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Deep down in the E-I dungeon
    Posts
    11,634
    Reviews
    29

    Default

    All your saying is true El Gordo. We pm any reviewer who doesn't give an accurate date or time regardless of whether it's positive or negative. We put it on hold for 5 days untill they respond. If theres no response it gets deleted.
    Last edited by thehighwayman; 13-09-10 at 06:19.

  7. #5
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    If im lucky..its with Ms Chambers
    Posts
    2,553
    Reviews
    6

    Default

    What the highwayman says is correct as i my self fell foul of this rule myself a few weeks ago and i was pmed by the afore mentioned.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •