Should this review be ratted?

[anon361]

It does shed a new light on the review one which I missed until it was pointed out to me last night, thanks btw.
To me this is a clear argument for some sort of a mark be placed on a profile similar to a rat but to show the reviewer is suspect. It would be unfair to rat all his reviews as debest has pointed out some are on the ball.

[debest]

Here's his review of Liz on the same day he reviewed Malena and Carmen. Escort Ireland - Escort Reviews - Review 008695 - Irish Independent Escorts, Irish Touring Escorts, Irish Escort Agencies

I feel like a right cunt now. A lot to learn I do.

[anon361]

I feel like a right cunt now. A lot to learn I do.

Awh, don't feel so bad buddy, it's actually a credit to you that you don't know all that went on in years gone by and if it makes you feel anybetter you always looked like a right cunt already

[debest]

Awh, don't feel so bad buddy, it's actually a credit to you that you don't know all that went on in years gone by and if it makes you feel anybetter you always looked like a right cunt already

I think there's an infraction on the way for Anon and then he'll leave. Sweet! This was all worth it!

In fairness, at least 4 other people were in agreement with me. But they didn't make cunts of themselves on the boards.

I've just been looking through some of Hot Lizzy's old posts. Nice lady.....

[thehighwayman]

El Gordo has it spot on. It's to do with the Liz and Malena & Carmen feud. It was very conveneint that he wrote such a glowing review of Liz and around the same time he wrote a very negative review of these girls.

Reasons for ratting reviews are given now. But they weren't always given.

[naughty_g5]

Now that everybody agrees review was rightly ratted, how about a petition to edit out last line? Genuine or fake, no review should have such a language no matter how bad the experience?

[El Gordo]

And maybe a brief note could be attached saying why it was ratted. At the time it must have been obvious to everyone, but as we can see, now it is easy to miss the background.

[Sensual Delights]

And maybe a brief note could be attached saying why it was ratted. At the time it must have been obvious to everyone, but as we can see, now it is easy to miss the background.

Couldn't agree more with this.
The reason why a review is ratted should always be given as people will always wonder.
If mods don't want to go into details, they can just set up some categories and add to the review, something like this maybe:

01. Same IP address as another escort / agency
02. Same IP address as another reviewer.
03. Same IP address as the escort - escort self promotion.
03. Malicious attempt to damage the business of the escort.
04. We believe this meeting never took place.

[Mondler]

Couldn't agree more with this.
The reason why a review is ratted should always be given as people will always wonder.
If mods don't want to go into details, they can just set up some categories and add to the review, something like this maybe:

01. Same IP address as another escort / agency
02. Same IP address as another reviewer.
03. Same IP address as the escort - escort self promotion.
03. Malicious attempt to damage the business of the escort.
04. We believe this meeting never took place.

..............................

[thehighwayman]

Couldn't agree more with this.
The reason why a review is ratted should always be given as people will always wonder.
If mods don't want to go into details, they can just set up some categories and add to the review, something like this maybe:

01. Same IP address as another escort / agency
02. Same IP address as another reviewer.
03. Same IP address as the escort - escort self promotion.
03. Malicious attempt to damage the business of the escort.
04. We believe this meeting never took place.

Mods always give reasons now why a review is ratted. This is an old review. They weren't always given an explanation back then. I'm not sure exactly when this review was ratted or who originally ratted it. This review is more than a year and a half ago. It could have been us, the review moderators before us or ad staff.