Should this review be ratted?

[El Gordo]

And maybe a brief note could be attached saying why it was ratted. At the time it must have been obvious to everyone, but as we can see, now it is easy to miss the background.

[Sensual Delights]

And maybe a brief note could be attached saying why it was ratted. At the time it must have been obvious to everyone, but as we can see, now it is easy to miss the background.

Couldn't agree more with this.
The reason why a review is ratted should always be given as people will always wonder.
If mods don't want to go into details, they can just set up some categories and add to the review, something like this maybe:

01. Same IP address as another escort / agency
02. Same IP address as another reviewer.
03. Same IP address as the escort - escort self promotion.
03. Malicious attempt to damage the business of the escort.
04. We believe this meeting never took place.

[Mondler]

Couldn't agree more with this.
The reason why a review is ratted should always be given as people will always wonder.
If mods don't want to go into details, they can just set up some categories and add to the review, something like this maybe:

01. Same IP address as another escort / agency
02. Same IP address as another reviewer.
03. Same IP address as the escort - escort self promotion.
03. Malicious attempt to damage the business of the escort.
04. We believe this meeting never took place.

..............................

[thehighwayman]

Couldn't agree more with this.
The reason why a review is ratted should always be given as people will always wonder.
If mods don't want to go into details, they can just set up some categories and add to the review, something like this maybe:

01. Same IP address as another escort / agency
02. Same IP address as another reviewer.
03. Same IP address as the escort - escort self promotion.
03. Malicious attempt to damage the business of the escort.
04. We believe this meeting never took place.

Mods always give reasons now why a review is ratted. This is an old review. They weren't always given an explanation back then. I'm not sure exactly when this review was ratted or who originally ratted it. This review is more than a year and a half ago. It could have been us, the review moderators before us or ad staff.

[Sensual Delights]

Well, it's good if you always provide the reason now.

[dingdong]

just spotted this.

yes it is a fake review,

i was promised a free visit if i posted a bad review of them,

im human but forgot all about it til now.

i never saw thos e busty carmen birds.

i think anyone in my position wud do the same as i am a lover of hookers and when u are told or asked to do something to get browny points while ur cock is in a nice birds mouth u will do so,am i right.only mistake i made is i left review 2 soon after meeting liz.controvarsy?

[luther]

just spotted this.

yes it is a fake review,

i was promised a free visit if i posted a bad review of them,

im human but forgot all about it til now.

i never saw thos e busty carmen birds.

i think anyone in my position wud do the same as i am a lover of hookers and when u are told or asked to do something to get browny points while ur cock is in a nice birds mouth u will do so,am i right.only mistake i made is i left review 2 soon after meeting liz.controvarsy?

You're a fuckin idiot. If you had any respect for the review system you'd have said no. Having your cock sucked by a "hooker" at the time is a bullshit excuse.........

If you had any respect for any of these "birds" you'd have said no........

You think the only mistake you made was to leave the review to soon after meeting Liz???

You sir, with respect, are a dickhead..........

Why is the review of Liz not ratted???

Why are all this guys reviews not ratted???

Why are all this guys reviews not deleted???

Why is this guy not banned for posting fake reviews???............He's admitted it.........

I wouldn't trust a fucking word you write here............

Only reason but to ban you and delete or at the very least rat all your reviews is because of the damage it would do to the genuine escorts you've met, or whichever ones you didn't give a good review to for a freebie......

Asshole.........

[dingdong]

ya well its done now,i didnt have to admit it but regretted it so i came clean.liz's review is true apart from the€150 issue which is a typo

she did infact charge me €50 but have only spotted it now that u spotted it.

but all other reviews are true.

but if u want to cry over spilt milk u can call me asshole all u want but at least i admitted it


dingdong

[samlad]

ya well its done now,i didnt have to admit it but regretted it so i came clean.liz's review is true apart from the€150 issue which is a typo

she did infact charge me €50 but have only spotted it now that u spotted it.

but all other reviews are true.

but if u want to cry over spilt milk u can call me asshole all u want but at least i admitted it


dingdong

It's easy to make a mistake and this typo has been resolved.

[El Gordo]

i think anyone in my position wud do the same

No. Although I wouldn't, I'm sure there are people here who would write a good review for a freebie. But writing a bad review of escorts you've never seen? I think there are few people who would stoop that low. I hope so, anyway.