JohnRambo - I appreciate you explanation but I still don't agree so we may leave it at that. It is my feeling that the reviewer is entitled to his own opinions and assessment. Just because someone visits and dislikes a person doesn't make that reviewer a fake.

And just because others assess a person differently doesn't make anyone who disagrees with them wrong.

You yourself acknowledge it - the only reason you ratted the review was it wasn't consistent with others. So if opinion doesn't conform, it is fake? wrong?

Now, had reviewer posted inaccurately, had facts been fabricated, or the poster was an obvious sham (to BLD's original premise - and BLD sorry that my post has hijacked your thread), if any of that was the case and the basis of your decision, I think we would all agree.

But in this case we will have to agree to disagree. In any event, I am thankful for what mods do.