whats the point of this review?

[wanted the best 69]

thanks. although had I read a bit more before posting it was answered already.

john, thats two of us, if i had read i would not have put my foot to arse of it

[johnmurphy]

John Murphy! My god, you haven't thanked me in a week. I am sorry, but as you may know a name like John is hard to place, may I ask if we have met before?:

yes we have met lucy. samlad has said i am not to thank you anymore, but feck him. thanks

[Lucy Chambers]

Thank you. I hope I wasn't too hideous. I take it you know what the feature is, and so I will leave you to keep on eye on whether a truthful answer comes back.

Many thanks

Lucy x

[johnmurphy]

Thank you. I hope I wasn't too hideous. I take it you know what the feature is, and so I will leave you to keep on eye on whether a truthful answer comes back.

Many thanks

Lucy x

you were beauty and charm itself my dear. i will indeed keep a weather eye open for a response but me thinks one may not be forth coming. but of course we must also allow for the fact that another client may pass fussy the info

[Lucy Chambers]

I am kind of over the whole thing, John. I spat my dummy, which I shouldn't have done. I would really like to hope it will not effect my future business in Ireland, but only time will tell. Luckily, a few people don't seem to mind my dresses. Thank you for your post, I did wonder what on earth I had done to deserve the thanks.

[wanted the best 69]

I am kind of over the whole thing, John. I spat my dummy, which I shouldn't have done. I would really like to hope it will not effect my future business in Ireland, but only time will tell. Luckily, a few people don't seem to mind my dresses. Thank you for your post, I did wonder what on earth I had done to deserve the thanks.

it won`t lucy, as to the dresses, who cares its whats inside that counts

[JAMESCORK]

john, thats two of us, if i had read i would not have put my foot to arse of it

69, you and Erika have a lot in common.

[An don]

I presume when the rules for reviews were set down in stone the rule writers believed that every situation was covered. But in all rule sets new issues crop up from time to time. I know there is an option when you are posting a review about meeting escort and left but i always belived that was for fake pics /agency and not for "she didnt do it for me ". I know to the letter of the law ,Highwayman is correct but i think a little bit of cop on needs to applied at times. Would this review have been posted if it was wrote by someone that registered on the same day (i dont think so because it would have been deemed trying to damage escort rep ). Mr fussy has totally abused his stature on this website by writing that review and this is further typified by his failure to reply to this thread , which imo is a totally display of arrogance . Finally this post might seem biased towards Lucy and it is.

[Fran Tick]

Perhaps this thread should be locked by now. No more replies after mine maybe?

[Lucy Chambers]

I love you Donna. I just had to say that, before they lock it.