worst number of neg, reviews, beat this if you can

**Lucy Chambers** · 13-08-10, 21:57

I wonder why none of the reviews were ratted by the moderators?

**aml** · 13-08-10, 22:09

Originally Posted by lucy chambers

I wonder why none of the reviews were ratted by the moderators?

There will always be a few that unfortuantly fall thru the net...it happens but they could have any number of reviews submitted in day,alot by timewasters...

**debest** · 13-08-10, 22:10

This is why guys you should read the reviews rather than just look to see if they're positive or negative. 1 of the neg reviews are actually positive but the knuckle head chose the wrong options. The other 4 are clearly fake and they should be deleted.

**Lucy Chambers** · 13-08-10, 22:12

Originally Posted by aml

There will always be a few that unfortuantly fall thru the net...it happens but they could have any number of reviews submitted in day,alot by timewasters...

But Aml...surely those particular reports were submitted over a three month period? And were doubly highlighted today? Profiles seem to be suspended in seconds, why can't rats magically appear?

**aml** · 13-08-10, 22:13

Originally Posted by debest

This is why guys you should read the reviews rather than just look to see if they're positive or negative. 1 of the neg reviews are actually positive but the knuckle head chose the wrong options. The other 3 are clearly fake and the should be deleted.

Possibly a review revamp would solve it...they are prob not the only 3 reviews classed as legit,i heard the other day from a member that one of their reviews was ratted even though it was legit.

**luther** · 13-08-10, 22:51

Originally Posted by lucy chambers

I wonder why none of the reviews were ratted by the moderators?

Not trying to shift blame or anything, but just to point out, the majority of these reviews were submitted prior to the introduction of review moderators........

**Lucy Chambers** · 13-08-10, 22:53

Ah, ok. I didn't realise. Surely she deserves a bit of post mod ratting then?

**luther** · 13-08-10, 22:53

Originally Posted by aml

Possibly a review revamp would solve it...

Again, I'd say you'll find there have been a good few changes to the review system since the majority of these reviews were submitted........

**luther** · 13-08-10, 22:56

Originally Posted by lucy chambers

Ah, ok. I didn't realise. Surely she deserves a bit of post mod ratting then?

I don't think it would be practical Lucy. It may not be fair, but there are literally thousands or reviews since the introduction of review mods, and changes to the review system. I guess the best we could hope for is an improvement in the system moving forward, which I think we have seen.........

**Westsidex** · 14-08-10, 06:35

Originally Posted by lucy chambers

I wonder why none of the reviews were ratted by the moderators?

Maybe there was no reviews mods or ratting in existance when they were submitted? Reviews mods are a fairly new concept here.

Westside.

Thread: worst number of neg, reviews, beat this if you can

Thread Tools

Search Thread

Display

The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Lucy Chambers For This Useful Post:

The Following User Says Thank You to aml For This Useful Post:

The Following User Says Thank You to debest For This Useful Post:

The Following User Says Thank You to Lucy Chambers For This Useful Post:

The Following User Says Thank You to aml For This Useful Post:

The Following User Says Thank You to luther For This Useful Post:

The Following User Says Thank You to Lucy Chambers For This Useful Post:

The Following User Says Thank You to luther For This Useful Post:

The Following User Says Thank You to luther For This Useful Post:

The Following User Says Thank You to Westsidex For This Useful Post:

Posting Permissions