Originally Posted by
anon361
Can I ask a question and it may be food for thought, a second review is allowed if the experience is considerably different to the first, that normally applies when it goes from a negative to a positive which is the example given in the review rules but could it not be considered considerably different because the first review was a duo with his wife and the second a 1 on 1 meeting, surely they would be 2 different experiences and people would like to see both outcomes?