The validity of reviews ?

[MrFussy]

Benin, good point, it makes sense. HOWEVER, it doesn't remove the risk of a TR "working the system" as their username will be obvious. But I take the point in general.

In relation to Qph's post, you can prove anything with statistics.... I would suggest that that review where the reviewer said that he had conversations via PM with the escort and was disappointed wasn't representative. I would further suggest that it is not helpful to the thread but might be considered (if from a non Moderator member) as trolling.................


BLD

I think the point is BLD that it was one of my reviews....

[Quarterpoundher]

I remember reading that review actually. The comments about her being frail and dishevelled are more striking than her not wearing make up.

I had not read it prior to this, just had the words "make up" to do a text search on and see what badged reviewers used those key words. That seems to be the only match apart from lots of people who use the words in the context of "make up your own mind".

[debest]

I had not read it prior to this, just had the words "make up" to do a text search on and see what badged reviewers used those key words. That seems to be the only match apart from lots of people who use the words in the context of "make up your own mind".

Heard you the first time man.

[Quarterpoundher]

Heard you the first time man.

Sorry about that, for some reason now and again there is a freeze and same post gets posted twice.

[debest]

Sorry about that, for some reason now and again there is a freeze and same post gets posted twice.

I forgive ya....

[bigladdub]

I agree, just in my experience I can't say that I've noticed a marked difference. As Jasmin has already pointed out, I think it was one of my reviews even, appointment was arranged by PM, and when I turned up the girl didn't even have make up and was in a dressing gown. I dare say it does happen that service may be elevated by some girls, but most of the top ladies on here are consistent with all customers, hence such positive reviews from trusted and nontrusted reviewers.

I agree Mr F... in general and with great girls, it really doesn't matter, the cream (excuse the pun) will always rise to the top. In order to understand my post, you would need to imagine that you weren't very principled. Or that, in time, status (as a TR) or ego or the temptation would get to somebody...

BLD

[Quarterpoundher]

Benin, good point, it makes sense. HOWEVER, it doesn't remove the risk of a TR "working the system" as their username will be obvious. But I take the point in general.

In relation to Qph's post, you can prove anything with statistics.... I would suggest that that review where the reviewer said that he had conversations via PM with the escort and was disappointed wasn't representative. I would further suggest that it is not helpful to the thread but might be considered (if from a non Moderator member) as trolling.................

BLD

How is providing data that exists on this site that is referred to by a poster trolling, regardless of who provides it? If I am reading you wrong I am sorry but it like you are saying it would fall into the category of trolling.

[bigladdub]

How is providing data that exists on this site that is referred to by a poster trolling, regardless of who provides it? If I am reading you wrong I am sorry but it like you are saying it would fall into the category of trolling.

Because I believe that it is the exception rather than the rule and that by posting it you aren't being true to fair posting. There was an interesting discussion going on and because you are a mod, if you wanted to post that link, I believe that you might have posted another link which supported the PM case and if you wanted to, make a comment on the incidence of each. To make a post like you did without balance and without supporting it with an opinion is not a fair observation.

This is just my opinion, I wont go into the fact that my view is that Mods have a responsibility when posting as Mods to be fairminded....

BLD

[Quarterpoundher]

Because I believe that it is the exception rather than the rule and that by posting it you aren't being true to fair posting. There was an interesting discussion going on and because you are a mod, if you wanted to post that link, I believe that you might have posted another link which supported the PM case and if you wanted to, make a comment on the incidence of each. To make a post like you did without balance and without supporting it with an opinion is not a fair observation.

This is just my opinion, I wont go into the fact that my view is that Mods have a responsibility when posting as Mods to be fairminded....

BLD

Hang on now, all I did was reply to someone who referred to a certain and particular review and I found it based on the data available, I have not commented on the issue itself, give me a key word and I will do my best to also find a review that meets that data.

[Jasmin]

Hang on now, all I did was reply to someone who referred to a certain and particular review and I found it based on the data available, I have not commented on the issue itself, give me a key word and I will do my best to also find a review that meets that data.

I wasn't sure if i could be that explicit but the link you provided was exactly the review I was referring to.