Reviews are a joke....

[camel69]

dude, I could have simply lied and said I met her yesterday and then according to your rules the review would have been accepted and on her profile.

However it would not have been a true review - as I said I do accept that there are some difficulties managing the reviews. BUT having read all you have to say I still can't understand how it is that I have a genuine review that you will NOT post, yet you are happy to post many reviews which are CLEARLY bogus and you guys even have the audacity to highlight that you are aware the review is bogus by sticking a rat on it, but you do still display it.

Thereby you are saying a 100% bogus review is more relevant than a 100% genuine review posted late - I am not a bastion of sense, however it does seem a little mad to me!

Why was it submitted twice when you seemed to know it would not be allowed in the first place?

You title the thread "Reviews are a joke" and then express your understanding of the challenges involved in modding them.

There has to be a cut of point for reviews, when is that? 3 months? a year? 10 years? when both the reviewer and reviewed are drawing the pension?

3 months is plenty time to get down in type the events. I do not get people who wake up one day maybe a year later and say "Christ I just gotta write that review for [insert name here]"

3 months is what was decided and until its changed people are going to have to send it in within that timeframe.

[anon361]

Thats all well and good when you want to leave a positive review but there has been a lot of grief in the past where a negative review has been left for an appointment that happened months previous and the lady in question was not in a position to ad a rebutt to the review because of the long time in between. It is only fair that they can ad a comment explaining their side and it was felt 3 months was a fair compromise..

[Quarterpoundher]

dude, I could have simply lied and said I met her yesterday and then according to your rules the review would have been accepted and on her profile.

However it would not have been a true review - as I said I do accept that there are some difficulties managing the reviews. BUT having read all you have to say I still can't understand how it is that I have a genuine review that you will NOT post, yet you are happy to post many reviews which are CLEARLY bogus and you guys even have the audacity to highlight that you are aware the review is bogus by sticking a rat on it, but you do still display it.

Thereby you are saying a 100% bogus review is more relevant than a 100% genuine review posted late - I am not a bastion of sense, however it does seem a little mad to me!

Yes you could have lied and we could not know however the whole point of us requiring a date and time be stated is so that any Escort so minded to keep records of all times and dates can reconcile her dates with what you say or anyone says, regardless of if that stated date being true or lies she has to have a baseline to work from. Its no good to her when someone says it was last year or last month even. There has to be a date and time commited to regardless of if thats true or not.

It is also not fair to expect escorts to have to keep records for years just in case someone decides to write a review a year or more later. Filing cabinets are not favored by most touring escorts whatever about the non touring escorts.