Page 3 of 6 FirstFirst 12345 ... LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 55

Thread: Dont call me a Liar.

  1. #21
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    2,860
    Blog Entries
    1
    Reviews
    12

    Talking

    oh rover, out of luck, well theres still my young setter bitch on heat

  2. #22
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Posts
    1,129

    Default

    Think he was just waiting for me to come on to have a dig. Anyway i beleive we will get back on track .mods, any feedback for toni yet?

    Rebecca



  3. #23
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    6,282
    Reviews
    9

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by english rebecca View Post
    Na, would rather give it a miss methinks, don't really like it when a chap puts his thoughts before the health of escorts.no hard feelings!
    Fair enough, my loss. I did take offence to the way you came back at me on the 2nd May, I was only being frank and honest and giving an account of some of my experiences, you came back at me rather harshly, there wasn't any need for that and now you are trying to justify OWO with todays post:-

    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Ooohh bitchy. I actually took it on board and went to the clinic to clarify these questions. I told them what i did(shyly) and i was informed that although owo does carry some risk, it is still a small risk.it is, however,on the increase. I then asked if they would advise me doing this service to which they replied"we beleive it is ok". There a risk, however small it is. I prefer owo, but am also aware that there is a risk.i beleive the thread was started initially in order to inform girls that check up need to be made. I now go to the clinic monthly and also have a throat swab done which i did not know to do do regularily before.

    You know something mate, you got issues in picking on me for doubting the safety of owo, at least i took it on board to go and get professional medical advice in person on the matter. There is absolutely all reason for girls to be safety aware, as you clearly are not and only think of empthing your bollocks.
    Safety does need to come first, and thus,, may i ask you if you go for regular checks when you have received owo. I very much doubt it.

    If everyone maintains regular health checks , then it should remain relatively safe. My concern out there is that many of you don't.

    I do know of a girl here who contracted gonorhea via owo in glaway a couple of years back and it was mentioned on the boards at that time as well.

    Girls are at least more aware now and are certainly more choosy about whom they perform owo with, a good thing.

    Btw, if you want to start a new thread about a different subject.

    This was about in an incorrect review re english toni which i hope is being resolved.


    Rebecca

    My original post:-

    While I have to agree with Jessie, I find it ironic that in a period of just over two years, I've seen about fifty escorts, I've only nine reviews, but I used to take a chance and visit the non verified girls, touch wood I've never been dissappointed yet, one girl I visited 8 times, then she suddenly dissappeared, she was based in Phibsboro'. Plus also repeat visits. However getting back to the point, only one lady gave me owo, all the others put a condom on, it wasn't very much fun for want of a better word, so I kind of avoid that, if I can without offending. But the irony is in the last month approx 80 percent of the escorts I visited performed owo, it was heavenly, the way I see it if you're dropping the head and wrapping your tongue around a vagina, that could be equally as risky. To conclude, I can see that it's a safer idea all round and common sense, it was good for the short period I received it. We will be going back to good old basic sexual intercourse as God intended soon, with no favourites.

    -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Rebecca taking the high moral ground (before she changed her with today's lame post).


    I am with you jessie, aids, syphillis and particularily gonnorhea has reached epidemic status in ireland, clients, be it at you r own peril. Survey by a wg's clinic in dublin state that 75% of immigrant prostitutes in ireland have an std.

    This means that owo both ways is a huge risk and more and more clients are asking for unprotected(sickos).

    You are all putting yourselves and the girls at risk and vice versa

    i know its better without but if it is so contagious and also classified by the health board as an epidemic, it says enough.

    Thank you for speaking up jessie.

    Please clients understand the risks, there is a real epidemic going on here.

    E reb

    -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Holy thursday, like you give a shite waht day it when you want a punt. Hypocrite. If you are having owo you have a 20% as opposed to 80% risk of contracting gonnorhea, but that is still a 1/5 chance if the girl has it in her mouth/throat..

    If an escort is providing owo 5 x/day then that punter sees another 3 girls that month who each see another 100/month between them...........a lot, then work out how many girls work here, so how many guys in irealand actually punt weekly.

    Epidemic............and it may have started from a wg or a client. It only takes 1 person along the owo chain to have and std to spread it to over 1000 in a week.


    It just seems like clients here often do not have regard or understanding of sexual health issues,it is good to see that a few of you have responded in what appears to be a sensible manner.


    Night

    e reb

    -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    No Hard Feelings - Sexy!
    Once a prick - always a prick.

  4. #24
    Natasha Guest

    Default

    I have ratted this review as i feel this is a case of mistaken identity.

  5. #25
    Natasha Guest

    Default

    First of all Booty asked for the review to be ratted. Secondly im guessing its a case of mistaken identity.

  6. #26
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    6,282
    Reviews
    9

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by wanted the best 69 View Post
    oh rover, out of luck, well theres still my young setter bitch on heat
    I called around to the house, but you and dog were out, so I rode your wife instead.
    Once a prick - always a prick.

  7. #27

    Default

    I think what Natasha means is that she suspects its a case of mistaken identity.

    Quote Originally Posted by KellyCurvybabe View Post
    why is this review not deleted by now esp if it mistaken identity
    You can fool some of the people all of the time, and all of the people some of the time, but you can not fool all of the people all of the time.
    Abraham Lincoln, (attributed)
    16th president of US (1809 - 1865)

  8. #28
    Natasha Guest

    Default

    I have made a decision based on the facts set before me. Thanks for your concern Kelly. I feel i have done right, it will stay ratted.



    Quote Originally Posted by KellyCurvybabe View Post
    but it dosnot comply with review rules therfore should be deleted

  9. #29
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Posts
    1,129

    Default

    It should not be ratted, it is just not toni. Another girl used her name when a client came. Full stop.it should be deleted at the end of the day. How does this justify the review system. Choc delight told the client that she used to be called english toni, hence his confusion. English toni has been coming here years and has always used toni and choc delight has alays used something along her lines. Its unfair and ridiculous!!

    Rebecca



  10. #30
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    16,753
    Reviews
    57

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Natasha View Post
    I have made a decision based on the facts set before me. Thanks for your concern Kelly. I feel i have done right, it will stay ratted.
    But what is your interpretation of this rule:
    (d) The meeting was more than 3 months ago. If you try circumvent this rule by saying "not exact date" the review will not be posted.
    How do we know when this meeting took place, it could have been more than 3 months ago with this statement in his review "it was a few weeks ago"
    Also you can confirm with both QPH and the highwayman who have been the ones mainly looking after the reviews that they will not post a review without an exact date as it does not give the lady a fair chance to defend herself, this guy doesn't even say where it took place. Are you saying we can now just give any date we wish or none??

Page 3 of 6 FirstFirst 12345 ... LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •