?????//????

[Alana]

No we are not Elle... but I have come up with one or two ways of seeing if a reviewer is probably a faker and there is not a lot of point in telling him how on the ratted review as then he will change tactic's and not do that again so would you rather it be ratted and hopefully you might trust my honesty in why its ratted but not state why or would you rather I tell all and have more fakes submitted by him or others that I would not be able to use anymore?

In fairness I try and state why I feel they are fake, pointed out contradictions and if he said xyz I pointed out if many others said the opposite and I recall I got my ass handed to me for doing so again to the broader readership make up your minds.

Also.. but when a review is ratted is says something along the lines that we "feel" its fake.. does not say anything about we have come up with Judge Judy level proof, that wording has been there on a rat statement since long before any com mods started helping in reviews.

Like you QPH i can spot a review which i believe to be fake based on writeprint, in laymans terms its studying digital fingerprints yes i have too much time on my hands

[Quarterpoundher]

I've said before that a reviews mod's job is basically an impossible one, and I dont envy you. But I would make one point. You seem to be confusing honesty and judgment. If you rat a review then I'm sure you feel it's fake. And I would say you're usually right. But it's a lot easier to be sure of that when we know the reasons. You usually give reasons, and I've commended you on that in the past. But when reasons are absent or partial there is always going to be doubt, and you shouldn't interpret that as people doubting you honesty, when they're just wondering if you haven't perhaps made a mistake.

Fair points and I do agree but as I say its just not "always" in the better interests of combating fakers to say why, if I told you one way I do, then its out there and they will see it and not repeat, I would say its partly about trust, if I rat a review and do not state why its because of something more then just my basing it on a hunch or hairs on the back of neck but I cannot say what that is but its not ratted on just judgement.

Also I provided vast reams of data that pointed very strongly to someone being a faker (when taken as a whole), far more data then probably anyone ever provided and it was pretty much ignored and got lost in the clammer to be white knights to one out of 30 or more so not a lot of point in providing this if its going to be ignored.

[anon361]

Also I provided vast reams of data that pointed very strongly to someone being a faker (when taken as a whole), far more data then probably anyone ever provided and it was pretty much ignored and got lost in the clammer to be white knights to one out of 30 or more so not a lot of point in providing this if its going to be ignored.

I wonder who that was, second time this example has come up, hypocrisy

https://www.escort-ireland.com/board...-everyone.html

[El Gordo]

I wonder who that was, second time this example has come up, hypocrisy

https://www.escort-ireland.com/board...-everyone.html

Third time, actually. You brought it up twice, Anon, once here and once on another thread about the same reviewer. I still don't see it. I'm not being defensive here, as I never called for this guy to be ratted. So I don't think I'm one of the ones being charged with hypocrisy. But I still don't think that's a fair statement. As I said above, in this case no one is defending any of this guy's reviews. I know you saw that, because you quoted it. So the two cases are different, and if people react differently then you've no good reason to go calling them hypocrites.

[MILF Hunter]

having been with Nikky not too long ago, I have to disagree with hhmmbb's review

her profile pics are 100% accurate...defo one of the most attractive and well mannered escort on the Irish scene

in my opinion, (and as Anon said) its obviously either fake or he picked the wrong Nikky..

Three cheers for Blond chick Nikky

Hip Hip...Hooray
Hip Hip...Hooray
Hip Hip...Hooray

[Quarterpoundher]

Even I know she is one of the very best and her rep is untouchable and that rep is earned after so many glowing reviews. I wish reviewers would double check the ID number of the escort they are reviewing if this is a case of the wrong Nikky being reviewed.

[El Gordo]

Even I know she is one of the very best and her rep is untouchable and that rep is earned after so many glowing reviews. I wish reviewers would double check the ID number of the escort they are reviewing if this is a case of the wrong Nikky being reviewed.

They shouldn't really need to check the number. A picture comes up when we select a name from the list. Anyone who can't recognise a picture of the escort he's reviewing probably shouldn't be writing a review. It happens, I know, but there's really no excuse. I don't think we've any way of knowing if that's what happened here. Based on the other reviews my guess would be that he's just a nut job, not a legitimate reviewer who happened to pick the wrong Nikky.

[TiffanyTees]

Why are some reviews rejected or edited or ratted?
We reject or edit or rat escort reviews submitted to us if:
(a) We establish they are untrue / malicious
(b) They are very poorly written / illegible / typed all in CAPS
(c) Our systems determine they are likely to be escort self-promotion (We record the IP etc details of each review submitted. Escorts can register multiple IDs here, and then post multiple positive reviews of themselves, but we will almost certainly catch you out if you try to play this game!)
(d) The meeting was more than 3 months ago. If you try circumvent this rule by saying "not exact date" the review will not be posted.
(e) The review contains swearing, insulting, degrading or abusive language.
(f) The review reveals info about the escort that it is not necessary to say and may comprimise the lady's privacy, e.g. saying exactly what hotel or apartments she is in, that she has a tattoo of X or is a student of Y etc.
(g) The review is a sexually explicit review of an escort who has asked clients not to leave sexually explicit reviews. Where a lady has requested reviewers don't leave sexually explicit reviews, a message stating this is shown to the reviewer at the time he is making the review. We ask reviewers to respect the escorts wishes in this situation, i.e. Say the lady provided a poor service by all means if you feel she did, but don't say her blow job skills were lacking or something explicit like that.
(h) The review is negative but no explanation as to why is given. It is not considered fair to leave a negative review without saying why.
(i) The reviews is not entirely in English. No foreign language reviews or comments not in English are allowed.
(j) The review has been copied from somewhere else.

DONT let it worry you Nikky babe !

As there are agencies ,other escorts ,pimps whatever will do reviews to discolour your reputation .I am sure everyone who knows you and met you wont take any notice of it at all.
love n licks Tiff xx

[Blond chick NIKKY]

having been with Nikky not too long ago, I have to disagree with hhmmbb's review

her profile pics are 100% accurate...defo one of the most attractive and well mannered escort on the Irish scene

in my opinion, (and as Anon said) its obviously either fake or he picked the wrong Nikky..



Three cheers for Blond chick Nikky

Hip Hip...Hooray
Hip Hip...Hooray
Hip Hip...Hooray

Hello MILF

thank you hunni. Always pleasure to meet guys like you. I am glad i had such honour. Thanks a lot! xxx

[Blond chick NIKKY]

Why are some reviews rejected or edited or ratted?
We reject or edit or rat escort reviews submitted to us if:
(a) We establish they are untrue / malicious
(b) They are very poorly written / illegible / typed all in CAPS
(c) Our systems determine they are likely to be escort self-promotion (We record the IP etc details of each review submitted. Escorts can register multiple IDs here, and then post multiple positive reviews of themselves, but we will almost certainly catch you out if you try to play this game!)
(d) The meeting was more than 3 months ago. If you try circumvent this rule by saying "not exact date" the review will not be posted.
(e) The review contains swearing, insulting, degrading or abusive language.
(f) The review reveals info about the escort that it is not necessary to say and may comprimise the lady's privacy, e.g. saying exactly what hotel or apartments she is in, that she has a tattoo of X or is a student of Y etc.
(g) The review is a sexually explicit review of an escort who has asked clients not to leave sexually explicit reviews. Where a lady has requested reviewers don't leave sexually explicit reviews, a message stating this is shown to the reviewer at the time he is making the review. We ask reviewers to respect the escorts wishes in this situation, i.e. Say the lady provided a poor service by all means if you feel she did, but don't say her blow job skills were lacking or something explicit like that.
(h) The review is negative but no explanation as to why is given. It is not considered fair to leave a negative review without saying why.
(i) The reviews is not entirely in English. No foreign language reviews or comments not in English are allowed.
(j) The review has been copied from somewhere else.

DONT let it worry you Nikky babe !

As there are agencies ,other escorts ,pimps whatever will do reviews to discolour your reputation .I am sure everyone who knows you and met you wont take any notice of it at all.
love n licks Tiff xx

Hi love,

thank you very much for your support. I appreciate that a lot. Your sweet.

Thanks and take care xxx