Results 1 to 8 of 8

Thread: New Reviews - Old Reviews

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    996
    Blog Entries
    1

    Question New Reviews - Old Reviews

    I just noticed the review below:

    Escort Ireland - Escort Reviews - Review 024746 - Irish Independent Escorts, Irish Touring Escorts, Irish Escort Agencies

    The comment from the review mod specifies that this is the newest review of the escort and the older review got deleted (according to the review rules). However, due to a mistake of the reviewer, the newest review is N/A. Based on this, I personaly would not have deleted the old one if this was anything else then a N/A. I do assume it was a positive one.

    All Top XX (Most Reviewed Escorts, El Gordo's Reliables) and Miss XX competitions here take in consideration only the actual reviews: positives, negatives and neutrals. A non applicable review is just an interesting reading material when it comes to the escort in cause, not anything else.

    So, do you think it is fair that an escort gets a positive review, the reviewer makes an innocent small mistake for the second review which was also meant to be a positive, the review mod deletes the second entry and then the poor escort has one posittive review less ???

    Just want to know your opinion in general, please don't bring into argument anything about the particular escort, reviewer or review mod.

    (Currently posting using ID "Sensual Delights")

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    I'm at the landmark - where are you?
    Posts
    1,219
    Blog Entries
    1
    Reviews
    55

    Default

    I think myself that if a new review is different they should be both / all left up. Sometimes a second or third review has no detail and you just have a general comment like "third time to see Abcd..." I'd like to read them all myself and compare.
    But you can't please everyone......

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    North Korea
    Posts
    16,785
    Reviews
    57

    Default

    Ok, there are a couple of issues here, firstly he said he was let down by Jessica so it's probable the first review was a negative or at best a neutral (we don't know because it was deleted) so had he submitted a positive review on this occasion and the first was negative, according to the rules the first review should be left up with the second as his experience has changed considerably, but as he submitted a neutral and the first was also a neutral / negative then it hasn't significantly changed..
    The problem is guys select the wrong option out of the initial 3 questions and if you pick the one that says made booking but didn't see escort you don't get to fill in the multiple choice questions which are what dictate whether it will be Neg, N/a or Pos and by default it will always be N/A.
    The review mods have in the past stated that they cannot second guess whether a review should be pos or neg solely on his comments, but I do agree in some instance it is so blatantly obvious that they should..

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Kerry
    Posts
    1,189
    Reviews
    132

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Prickly View Post
    I think myself that if a new review is different they should be both / all left up. Sometimes a second or third review has no detail and you just have a general comment like "third time to see Abcd..." I'd like to read them all myself and compare.
    But you can't please everyone......
    I think that was well spotted Karin and I agree totally with prickly. If a client keeps seeing a lady and gives her
    loads of positive reviews, then the most detailed one should be left in my opinion.
    I know the onus is on us punters to not keep submitting like reviews for escorts, but for the minority that still do, would
    leaving the most detailed as opposed to the most recent be an option? (Most recent review could be something like "third time to see
    xxxx, please see previous reviews").
    However if there are conflicting reviews of an escort, surely all those reviews should be left up so all
    punters can take what they want out of each review?

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    In a cathouse
    Posts
    3,548
    Blog Entries
    1
    Reviews
    26

    Default

    The initial review in this case was #23149. It was neutral,
    Code:
     Escort(s):  Jessica
    
     Reviewer:   Felster
                 Join Date: 13/12/08
                 Message Board Usergroup: Registered User
                 Message Board Posts: 0
                 Reviews: 19
    
       Type:     Female Escort
     Location:   Dublin
     Incall or   Incall
      Outcall:
    Time / Date: 7pm / 25/04/10
     Duration:   30 Minutes
       Cost:     ?130
                 Last reviewer is not wrong. I don't think she is even in the country.
                 She told me that she was going to be delayed at the last minute to
      Review:    make sure I was near her place, then she asked me if i'd meet with
                 her friend Sara. I met Sara who was quite nice, but felt Jessica was
                 taking advantage of my hornyness. :(
     Favourites  Oral, Sex, French Kissing
      Enjoyed:
    Accuracy of  Not Applicable
      Photos:
       Incall    Very Happy
     Location:
      Physical   Fairly Attractive
    Appearance:
      Service    Fairly Happy
     Provided:
     Value for   Fairly Happy
       Money:
      Overall    Neither Happy nor Unhappy
    Satisfaction
     Would You   Maybe
     Recommend?
     Would You   Maybe
    See Again?:
    
    This review was submitted or last updated on 26/04/10.
    It looks like this one was equally confused, since he's reviewing an escort he didn't meet, but it's not an N/A.

    “I wish you wouldn’t keep appearing and vanishing so suddenly; you make one quite giddy!”
    “All right,” said the Cat; and this time it vanished quite slowly, beginning with the end of the tail, and ending with the grin, which remained some time after the rest of it had gone.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    North Korea
    Posts
    16,785
    Reviews
    57

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by El Gordo View Post
    The initial review in this case was #23149. It was neutral,
    Code:
    Escort(s): Jessica
    
    Reviewer: Felster
    Join Date: 13/12/08
    Message Board Usergroup: Registered User
    Message Board Posts: 0
    Reviews: 19
    
    Type: Female Escort
    Location: Dublin
    Incall or Incall
    Outcall:
    Time / Date: 7pm / 25/04/10
    Duration: 30 Minutes
    Cost: ?130
    Last reviewer is not wrong. I don't think she is even in the country.
    She told me that she was going to be delayed at the last minute to
    Review: make sure I was near her place, then she asked me if i'd meet with
    her friend Sara. I met Sara who was quite nice, but felt Jessica was
    taking advantage of my hornyness. :(
    Favourites Oral, Sex, French Kissing
    Enjoyed:
    Accuracy of Not Applicable
    Photos:
    Incall Very Happy
    Location:
    Physical Fairly Attractive
    Appearance:
    Service Fairly Happy
    Provided:
    Value for Fairly Happy
    Money:
    Overall Neither Happy nor Unhappy
    Satisfaction
    Would You Maybe
    Recommend?
    Would You Maybe
    See Again?:
    
    This review was submitted or last updated on 26/04/10.
    It looks like this one was equally confused, since he's reviewing an escort he didn't meet, but it's not an N/A.
    Thanks Gordo, your right, his first review shouldn't have been put up either as like you said he's reviewing another girl on Jessica's profile, looks like he should have selected, made a booking but didn't meet in that instance, can people not read

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Johannesburg, SA
    Posts
    3,650
    Blog Entries
    32

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by anon361 View Post
    Thanks Gordo, your right, his first review shouldn't have been put up either as like you said he's reviewing another girl on Jessica's profile, looks like he should have selected, made a booking but didn't meet in that instance, can people not read
    People can read just fine, it is their dicks that have a problem with it.

    RETURNING TO THE EMERALD ISLE SHORTLY
    ❤❤❤❤

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    North Korea
    Posts
    16,785
    Reviews
    57

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Violette View Post
    People can read just fine, it is their dicks that have a problem with it.
    HeHe, unfortunately Violette in your presence the little brain is always going to take over, mind you I have heard a swift kick to the nuts puts him right back in his place

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •