Results 1 to 10 of 23

Thread: Ruhama backs Judge Neilan's calls for brothel users to be named and shamed

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    2,395

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Westsidex View Post
    Ruhama are actually helping trafficking to continue by claiming most escorts are trafficked. In fact its the other way around in that most escorts are not trafficked. We had two cases lately where ppl were jailed for running brothels yet ,and according to the police this is, no trafficking was involved in these cases. Ruhamas gross exaggeration is contributing to the problem.

    Westside.
    Oh definitely... it has almost nothing to do with Ruhama wanting to save girls who might actually be in trouble because Ruhama wouldn't have a flipping clue how to even start trying to do that. It has everything to do with Ruhama wanting trying to control things and express their disgust at people having sex, even if they don't admit it to themselves that that's the real reason.

    It's about Ruhama trying to stop women from doing what they want themselves with their own bodies. It's an instinctive thing, I think, for women to hate other women who are "slutty" or getting a lot of sex.

    Have you ever seen an extremely hot girl that you really wanted and yet for some reason can't have, and you get angry and jealous and frustrated? But then you just have to let it go and have a wank at home maybe. These people won't let it go. These people and others get these feelings as well, so they try their very best to exhert as much control and power as they can on the situation.

    Their opinions of sex are all so artificial and unnatural and unhealthy. They don't even have to get sex, just to think of sex in a natural and ordinary way, accept that we should in fact all be naked all the time and that sex is a really natural thing. Then they wouldn't get so hung up over this sort of thing and just leave people alone.
    Last edited by nicegirlsarenice; 20-05-10 at 13:47.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    5,673
    Reviews
    35

    Default

    i often dont give my name! get a life!

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    8,431
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    It was this that led Judge Neilan to remark: "The quicker legislation is brought in to enable the publishing of the names and addresses of the people who avail of such services, then the better."
    Legislation to allow people who are availing if a legally provided service to have their names and addresses published???

    Idiot................
    "It's far easier to fight for principles than to live up to them."
    L

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    5,608
    Blog Entries
    1
    Reviews
    95

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by luther View Post
    Legislation to allow people who are availing if a legally provided service to have their names and addresses published???

    Idiot................
    This has to do with a brothel, brothels are not legal
    Blatant promotion should be outlawed
    but
    Vincent Browne is a Hero

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •