Ruhama backs Judge Neilan's calls for brothel users to be named and shamed

[luther]

Because it's in the paper Ber...........

Ruhama backs Judge Neilan's calls for brothel users to be named and shamed - Longford Today

[nicegirlsarenice]

ber, it was Patricia, the site administrator who posted it in the first place. If Longford Today is allowed to publish it, then E-I can repeat it. Only if Longford Today was sued over it or issued an apology would it even be in question. And furthurmore, if Patricia is allowed to post it, I very much doubt the mods are going to delete or modify it.

I find this piece amusing: "To avoid detection, many are moved from town to town and county to county, a practice which has taken on a raft of new and sinister dimensions according to Ms Rowley."

lol. Oh so it's to avoid detection that they move around or "are moved", makes a lot of sense.

Luther, I almost hate to say this but if you look closely, technically Judge Neilan may have been referring to users of "brothels" or where there are two or more girls at a time, not "legal" users of single escorts. I wouldn't be in any way surprised if he wasn't making that distinction at all though.

[ber]

[QUOTE=luther;218997]Because it's in the paper Ber...........

Ruhama backs Judge Neilan's calls for brothel users to be named and shamed - Longford Today[/QUOT
No Luther stuff that has been in the paper the names are constantly edited out on here

[luther]

Not always Ber...........

[ber]

Legislation to allow people who are availing if a legally provided service to have their names and addresses published???

Idiot................

This has to do with a brothel, brothels are not legal

[luther]

Luther, I almost hate to say this but if you look closely, technically Judge Neilan may have been referring to users of "brothels" or where there are two or more girls at a time, not "legal" users of single escorts. I wouldn't be in any way surprised if he wasn't making that distinction at all though.

Yes I agree. In fact he was probably referring to people who avail of the services of trafficked girls..........

But It's a blanket statement...........

[ber]

Not always Ber...........

Will u explain the distinction between printing this ladies name and editing out a midlands pimps name who was convicted earlier in the year?

[Westsidex]

Can anyone explain why it is ok to publish this ladies name and adress here in full when usually the post is edited and then followed by alot of tut tuting and saying how we can not publish names . Better still 2 mods have replied to the thread and ignored it. So i presume now we can print names as we wish

Well it was an oversight on my part to be honest and i only read the heading and not the rest of it. Nope ber names cant be printing as you wish.I will let "The Sweetie" (reg tm) decide on this.

I genuinely over looked it,
Westside.

[ber]

Well it was an oversight on my part to be honest and i only read the heading and not the rest of it. Nope ber names cant be printing as you wish.I will let "The Sweetie" (reg tm) decide on this.

I genuinely over looked it,
Westside.

I presume ull warn her and ban her for a week

[luther]

Will u explain the distinction between printing this ladies name and editing out a midlands pimps name who was convicted earlier in the year?

I don't know, give me a hint will ya???

Is it because this lady isn't in the country any more???

Or is it because it was Patricias post and I'm hardly going to edit it???

Or Because it's her site and her decision to put it there???

Or because you just want to stir shite???

I love multiple choice me..............