What makes someone a trusted reviewer?

[JAMESCORK]

I'm not impressed at all by this and dissapointed it was posted, personal details of the client should never be repeated, would you be impressed if we dig up your history A.P and started to post it here

To whom are you refering to Anon.

[Bodkin]

Hi,

I can't answer the question of how a reviewer gets the little badge symbol. I assumed it was something to do with the number of reviews posted. I can tell you from a client's perspective that it means relatively little to me. This is not to say that the review system is not worthwhile; it is far from perfect but it is necessary and useful for all parties. One of the worst aspects of the review system is that thoughtless and faceless individuals can attempt to damage an escort's reputation and livelihood with their callous vitriol.

Personally I consider a number of factors when browsing through the profiles on this site, including the number of reviews, the overall trend (i.e., are there more positive than negative reviews?), and only then am I interested in the content of the individual reviews themselves. This way such an outlier as a single negative review amongst twenty or more positive reviews becomes very obviously a reflection on the reviewer not the escort in question.

Again it is a purely personal thing but I would pay very little attention to a reviewer that would make such a gratuitously vulgar comment as "fergal" has done in this review. Such behaviour to me seems like the act of an ignorant, rude, inconsiderate, and ill-bred troglodyte; not somebody whose opinion would mean anything to me. In fact rather than having any negative affect on my opinion of the person being reviewed, such a vulgar review would cause me to discount any other reviews by the same reviewer.

The important thing is that you have managed to turn this into a positive for your profile: by posting a rational, clearly expressed, and professional response you have shown yourself to be a high calibre professional who takes their reputation seriously. Good for you.

Bodkin.

[thehighwayman]

Feargals entitled to write his review as truthfully as the encounter was for him. Whether he was a trusted reviewer or not he is one of a number reviewers reviews I would trust. He is always honest. She wasn't to his liking. Not every escort that has many glowing reviews appeals to everyone. We all have different tastes. At least he's honest plenty other reviewers are afraid to tell it as it is. It's still not a bad review he's still complimentary towards her service. She just wasn't to his liking. He's entitled to his opinion. She shouldn't have put his age range on the rebuttal that's uncalled for.

[thehighwayman]

Just because Feargals experience wasn't the same as most other reviewers doen't mean she's a bad escort. She just didn't appeal to him.

[anon361]

To whom are you refering to Anon.

Liberty of course and her rebuttal.. A bit paranoid JC

[El Gordo]

I'm not impressed at all by this and dissapointed it was posted, personal details of the client should never be repeated, would you be impressed if we dig up your history A.P and started to post it here

Who is A.P.?

To whom are you refering to Anon.

Liberty of course and her rebuttal.. A bit paranoid JC

I don't think JAMESCORK is being paranoid. It looks very much like A.P. are the initials of Liberty's real name. They may not be, but it's a reasonable inference and you've missed two opportunities to deny it. If you have maliciously posted personal information about an escort, and implicitly threatened to reveal more, then you should be banned. If not then you need to explain you're "A.P." reference better than you have.

[anon361]

I don't think JAMESCORK is being paranoid. It looks very much like A.P. are the initials of Liberty's real name. They may not be, but it's a reasonable inference and you've missed two opportunities to deny it. If you have maliciously posted personal information about an escort, and implicitly threatened to reveal more, then you should be banned. If not then you need to explain you're "A.P." reference better than you have.

Ok, I can see the point but I assumed a long standing member like JC would have remembered her history, I wouldn't expect you to because it wasn't written in code or numbers or with a % sign Maybe you should read her reviews and you will see who A.P is.. You could start with this one:
Escort Ireland - Escort Reviews - Review 007154 - Irish Independent Escorts, Irish Touring Escorts, Irish Escort Agencies

[El Gordo]

Ok, I can see the point but I assumed a long standing member like JC would have remembered her history, I wouldn't expect you to because it wasn't written in code or numbers or with a % sign Maybe you should read her reviews and you will see who A.P is.. You could start with this one:
Escort Ireland - Escort Reviews - Review 007154 - Irish Independent Escorts, Irish Touring Escorts, Irish Escort Agencies

You have to admit that the question "would you be impressed if we dig up your history A.P and started to post it here?" sounded like a threat, and, for those of us who do not memorise every name every escort has ever used, the initials AP could be very cryptic.

[thehighwayman]

Liberty has just left a comment on Feargals review. She has appologised for her original comment.

[anon361]

You have to admit that the question "would you be impressed if we dig up your history A.P and started to post it here?" sounded like a threat, and, for those of us who do not memorise every name every escort has ever used, the initials AP could be very cryptic.

I don't threaten escorts, if it came across as a threat I apologise, I was just inferring she wouldn't be impressed with her personal information being posted here, and no A.P is the intitials of her old profile so it is nothing personal.