Before we go any further Harry, I know that you're not trying to piss anybody off or offend anyone, in fact, I think you, and the other posters in this thread are to be complimented for the mature way this subjuct is being discussed here........
And I know what you're saying, but I think it's just the way you're saying it..........
I think what you mean is, in your opinion, a male female couple would make better adoptive parents than a same sex couple as in your opinon it's a more stable and traditional structure..............And I can't argue with that Harry, that's your opinion, but there's nothing to say that a same sex couple couldn't also provide a loving and stable enviornment in which to raise and child or children...........
I know you don't really believe the homosexual/pedophelia thing..............we'll call that propaganda by the opposition, in particular, by the Catholic Church........
"It's far easier to fight for principles than to live up to them."
L
Please show me where this is a fact..................
Idiot............
Because Cardinal Tarcisio Bertone said it???
One of the leaders of an institution that harbours and protects one of the largest pedophiles rings in the world.............
Ya, a reliable sourse alright...........
"It's far easier to fight for principles than to live up to them."
L
Stop ganging up on Harry, you liberal gits, he's entitled to his opinion!!!
Anyway, mine is that there are thousands and thousands of scumbag heterosexual couples who should never have been allowed to have children because they're only breeding the next generation of scumbags. I don't have a problem with homosexual couples adopting children - there's a fairly rigorous screening procedure in there these days.
Also, the implication that a homosexual man is more likely to be a paedophile is not only homphobic, it also encourages homophobia. Paedophiles are sick bastards, whether they're gay, straight, lesbian, bisexual, transgendered, or whatever.
Anything's a dildo if you're brave enough.