Results 1 to 10 of 30

Thread: The New Trusted Reviewers

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    13,265

    Default

    Congrats boys

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Posts
    1,596
    Blog Entries
    2
    Reviews
    51

    Default

    congratulations lads

    Who do I trust? I trust me!


  3. #3
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    16,753
    Reviews
    57

    Default

    Welcome onboard lads, but Ric, only 3 I suppose quality rather than substance

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Posts
    1,224
    Reviews
    33

    Default

    Congrats lads . 3 genuine additions for a change.

    Mods .When will all the fakes or people who have been caught out be deleted.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Posts
    5,866
    Reviews
    38

    Default

    this is certainly good news. Congratulations guys!

  6. #6

    Default

    Fair play, but I think that criteria is bullshit.

    I think too much time is spent on issues like this when other worrying agendas are glossed over on this site.
    How can it be justified that if I want to apply to be a 'trusted reviewer' I need three written references when a person advertising can do so without their welfare being checked out?

    Bit of a contradiction really.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    21,994
    Reviews
    113

    Default

    Congrats Harry, Epsilon and Gaaman. I notice that two of my favs to also become TRs were among the first to commend you. I am a bit dissapointed that so few were awarded in the time frame that commenced over 2 moths ago. But still lets not take from your appointment to TR status. You have helped me and others. For this we thank you.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •