Page 4 of 5 FirstFirst ... 2345 LastLast
Results 31 to 40 of 49

Thread: Industrial Society and Its Future

  1. #31
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    2,395

    Default

    Even though I admire a lot of what Kaczynski stands for, making up bombs is not a natural thing. Writing manifestos isn't a natural thing.

    He rejected computers and the internet, the exact things that actually take power out of the government and higher powers and put back into the ordinary people.

    He also calls conservatives "fools". Not any particular type of them, just them all fools in general.

    I have no idea WTF you're doing plastering it on E-I. You probably just found out about it yesterday or something.

  2. #32
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Posts
    427
    Reviews
    8

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by nicegirlsarenice View Post
    Even though I admire a lot of what Kaczynski stands for, making up bombs is not a natural thing. Writing manifestos isn't a natural thing.

    He rejected computers and the internet, the exact things that actually take power out of the government and higher powers and put back into the ordinary people.

    He also calls conservatives "fools". Not any particular type of them, just them all fools in general.

    I have no idea WTF you're doing plastering it on E-I. You probably just found out about it yesterday or something.
    Industrial soceity will destroy man. Theres an energy and an enviromental crunch coming in next 5 to 20 years.
    If industrial soceity survies this camalties machines will evolve to eiether rule us or we will in a matter of generations
    evelve into machines

    He says conseravties are fools becuse they defend social values but chamiopn progress but progress destroys trad . social values
    like the way the pill was major contributation to the breakdown of the nuclear family unit and the west

    I doubt if it is possible to go back given the human nature and the fragmented nature of the race and world.
    At the moment the intenet is a free place largely but this will change In time the inetrnet will be used to monitor us
    Fixed Cyber space ID for all of us no access without etc . All in the name of stopping the "terriots" or porn or whatever.
    interbet 3.0 they will call it safe and secure.

  3. #33
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    2,395

    Default

    But conservatives don't "champion progress", conservatives are very skeptical of and staunchly opposed to progress that isn't shown to be fruitful to humankind. They are very wary of the ethical and practical dangers. That's one of their defining aspects.

    It's the conservatives who are opposed to all that stem cell research, and nuclear power, and green technology and all that other "progress". It's the liberals who are into all that new-age shit. That's their THING, that's their IDEAL. I think Kaczynski got liberals and conservatives mixed up.

    He could have found a lot of conservative friends (at least a lot more than liberal ones), but no.... he felt it better to just stroke them all with the same simple-minded brush and insult them all.

    I agree humanity is out of control and we're going to destroy ourselves and cause a lot of torture and suffering before it if we continue this way though.

    People can't imagine the entire world blowing up because it's not a part of our primitive, instinctive mind. We think "okay, well maybe something twice the size of Chernobyl is the worst thing that could ever possibly happen somewhere in the world" But nuclear equations don't go up in multiples, they go up in exponentials. That's why I do think heading this way we're all going to die.... or maybe our children or our children's children... you'd have to be stupid to think the government and regulators are really going to stop it if it gets too easy. The only thing we can hope for is that maybe there really would be a limit to how much we could do barring nuclear warheads (which put together and launched could destroy the entire planet several times over), but don't count on it.

    But Kaczynski's idea of randomly killing people is no solution. And you can't force someone to read something. Ironically he could have set up his own website AND used his high academic PhD standing to sell books and crap on primitivity. He could be seen as a genius who foresake the world of mathematics to try to save human kind. But no, he threw all that away to give people who believe in the natural world a bad name.
    Last edited by nicegirlsarenice; 06-04-10 at 14:30.

  4. #34
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    8,242
    Reviews
    10

    Default

    Ever play Fallout 3? That's a fuckin' ace game

  5. #35
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Posts
    427
    Reviews
    8

    Default Environmental disater emmiement

    Environmental disater emmiement

    Plastic pollution in the seas
    YouTube - The Great Pacific Garbage Patch - Good Morning America

    honey bees dying
    YouTube - 60 Minutes: Why Are Honeybees Disappearing? Pt. 1

  6. #36
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    8,431
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Why didn't you just post the link................

    The Annotated Unabomber Manifesto (Industrial Society and its Future)
    "It's far easier to fight for principles than to live up to them."
    L

  7. #37
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    8,242
    Reviews
    10

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by whiteknight111 View Post
    Industrial soceity will destroy man.
    Human beings will never die out. We're too adaptive, too intuitive, and too damn clever to ever fuck up that badly. Nobody's ever going to be stupid enough to precipitate a global nuclear war, and if they did, well, there'd always be survivors somewhere. Same goes for a global pandemic - you always get survivors. And that, after 35,000 years or so in our present evolutionary stage, is what a Human is - a survivor.

  8. #38
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    2,395

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by anonymouse View Post
    Human beings will never die out. We're too adaptive, too intuitive, and too damn clever to ever fuck up that badly. Nobody's ever going to be stupid enough to precipitate a global nuclear war, and if they did, well, there'd always be survivors somewhere. Same goes for a global pandemic - you always get survivors. And that, after 35,000 years or so in our present evolutionary stage, is what a Human is - a survivor.
    What a load of fucking bullshit.
    .
    Nobody's ever going to be stupid enough?

    DUDE, PLENTY OF PEOPLE ARE EXTREMELY STUPID ALL THE FUCKING TIME!

    Too adaptive, too intuitive, and too damn clever? You clearly haven't thought this through. Intelligence has almost NOTHING to do with survival. Intelligence sometimes hurts survival.

    You KNOW that some muslim or someone out there WOULD blow up the planet if he got the chance. So WHY are you saying that?!

    You've gotten into a complex of equating intelligence with survival. A cat doesn't get addicted to heroin and die. It's intelligence that's fucked man up so badly. And instead of trying to use YOUR intelligence to try to solve it, you sit back and say "lol, we're so smart that we won't die", that's fucking retarded.

    The fucking neanderthals were survivors for millions of years as well.

    The dodos were survivors as well. The dodo was "a survivor"

    I think you are a good poster usually anonymouse. But it just pisses me off when people say stuff like that.

    "The world was never blown up before DURRRRRRRRRR IT WON'T HAPPEN IN THE FUTURE!!!12342!!!!"
    Last edited by nicegirlsarenice; 07-04-10 at 16:53.

  9. #39
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Posts
    427
    Reviews
    8

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by anonymouse View Post
    Ever play Fallout 3? That's a fuckin' ace game
    NA..... don't play comp games for years
    I remember years ago on the old PC lemmings
    that was class, I used to love nuking them 5, 4, 3, 2, Oh no



  10. #40
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    310
    Reviews
    18

    Default

    Whiteknight,

    With the greatest respect, I would suggest that merely cutting and pasting the arguably lunatic ramblings of someone else are no real addition to any debate, nor do they present a sense of considered thought.

    If you have opinions on the vast amount of info you have posted, I for one would appreciate your voicing of those oopinions. Otherwise, you are in real danger of losing credibility with the rest of the user community.

    Does anyone agree with me?

    BLD

Page 4 of 5 FirstFirst ... 2345 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •