The IP evidence is completely solid.
Of course I listen to members of this site and take into consideration their feelings, but do you seriously expect me to consider unbanning a user caught writing a fake review, despite the fact he hasn't even admitted his wrongdoing and apologised for it, because he has friends that would like him back?
Are you for real?
Pat x
Maybe integrity is not ur strong point, i would take the same stance as jackpot has done, what is wrong with asking him before he was banned what the story was. But that is not the issue here its the confusion here over why he was banned in the first place, no clear story. And just look at the amount of support he has gotten. It seem to me the only people not supporting him are a couple of real trolls and the mods.
Some PPL mistake an attempt at reconciliation, as a personal attack or insult......
this is quite simple all jackpot has to do is contact patricia and apologise for his fake review and explain why he did such a stupid thing i have to be honest i am very surprised at jackpot doing this i really am this thread can go on and on but jack needs to explain to the mods and apologise for what he did its as simple as that
Are you for real?
Yes pat i am for real the ip evidence is not solid and repeating that over and over does not make it so, have u read the other thread, and banning someone for this is unusual here. But i can see u have dug ur heels in and cannnot back down now, sad this is....
Some PPL mistake an attempt at reconciliation, as a personal attack or insult......
But surely Patricia ,you would agree that a poster with jackpot posting history , would be entitled to a simple pm to ask about the review before he was banned. This would have cleared up the matter. It seem more like a case of someone charging head first in to making a decision. Its not as if every fake reviewer here is immediately banned.